Literature DB >> 9153171

Laparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication. A prospective randomized study.

S Laine1, A Rantala, R Gullichsen, J Ovaska.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has gained wide acceptance among surgeons, but the results of the laparoscopic procedure have not been compared to the results of an open fundoplication in a randomized study.
METHODS: Some 110 consecutive patients with prolonged symptoms of grade II-IV esophagitis were randomized, 55 to laparoscopic (LAP) and 55 to an open (OPEN) Nissen fundoplication. Postoperative recovery, complications, and outcome at 3- and 12-month follow-up were compared in the two groups.
RESULTS: Five LAP operations were converted to open laparotomy due to esophageal perforation (two), technical difficulties (two), and bleeding (one). In the OPEN group (two) patients underwent splenectomy. There was no mortality. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days in the LAP group and 6.4 in the OPEN group. Dysphagia and gas bloating were the most common complaints 3 months after the operation in both groups. These symptoms had disappeared at the 12-month follow-up examination. All patients in the LAP group and 86% in the OPEN group were satisfied with the result.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a safe and feasible procedure. Complications are few and functional results are good if not better than those of conventional open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9153171     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  52 in total

1.  The changing face of treatment for hiatus hernia and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  D I Watson; P G Devitt; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  N J Soper; D Dunnegan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Surgery for hiatal hernia and GERD. Time for reappraisal and a balanced approach ?

Authors:  D E Low
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Complications of laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; A C de Beaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Laparoscopic fundoplication. Indications and results].

Authors:  K H Fuchs; H Feussner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in relieving the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eliminating antireflux medical therapy.

Authors:  P K Papasavas; R J Keenan; W W Yeaney; P F Caushaj; D J Gagné; R J Landreneau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Protagonist.

Authors:  L Lundell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Relapsing cardial stenosis after laparoscopic nissen treated by esophageal stenting.

Authors:  Philippe Pouderoux; Eric Verdier; Philippe Courtial; Catherine Bapin; Bernard Deixonne; Jean-Louis Balmès
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Laparoscopic Nissen repair: indications, techniques and long-term benefits.

Authors:  K H Fuchs; W Breithaupt; M Fein; J Maroske; I Hammer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-03       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.