Literature DB >> 9152922

Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy: a prospective multi-institutional study.

G J Teng1, R F Jeffery, J H Guo, S C He, H Z Zhu, X H Wang, Y Z Wu, J M Lu, X L Ling, Y Qian, Y M Zhang, M J Zhu, L Guan, X M He.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective study in 10 independent hospitals from 1992 to 1994 evaluated automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD) with a newly designed percutaneous instrument.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand five hundred eighty-two APLD procedures were performed in 1,525 patients with disc herniation or back pain. Mean follow-up after APLD was 18.3 months. Follow-up of at least 1 year was available in 1,474 patients. One thousand two hundred eighty-nine patients had sciatic pain and 185 had back pain only. Eight hundred twenty-two patients had symptoms for less than 2 years, 652 for more than 2 years. One thousand two hundred sixty-two patients were older than 60 years, 212 were younger than 60 years. Nine hundred fifty patients had disc protrusion, and 357 had sequestration. Forty-eight patients had disc or longitudinal ligament calcification. Twenty-two had previous surgical discectomy. All discectomies were done with use of a straight needle with the patient in the lateral decubitus position.
RESULTS: Success rate (measured by Hijikata's criteria) was 83% at 1 year. Success was significantly greater for protrusion versus sequestration (86% vs 72%, P < .001); for back pain alone versus leg and back pain (89% vs 80%, P < .005); for duration of symptoms less than 2 years versus more than 2 years (85% vs 79%, P < .005); and for age younger than 60 years versus older than 60 years (84% vs 76%, P < .01). Among postsurgical patients, success rate was 77% (17 of 22 patients). The only complication was discitis (0.06%, nine patients). Technical success at L5-S1 was 99% (795 of 800).
CONCLUSION: APLD with Teng's instrument has excellent results. Indications may include back pain alone. A straight needle can be used at L5-S1 in most patients, with proper positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152922     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70589-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

1.  Feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous lateral lumbar discectomy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Wenjin Jiang; Bolin Sun; Qirui Sheng; Xuepeng Song; Yanbo Zheng; Ligang Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Randomized clinical trial comparing lumbar percutaneous hydrodiscectomy with lumbar open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc protrusions and herniations.

Authors:  Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Ivan Diasda Rocha; Raphael MartusMarcon; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoade Barros Filho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  Current Concepts in Intradiscal Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Procedures for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Ioannis Gelalis; Ioannis Gkiatas; Antonios Spiliotis; Dimitrios Papadopoulos; Emilios Pakos; Marios Vekris; Anastasios Korompilias
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.