Literature DB >> 9152445

Finite element analysis of cervical facetectomy.

L M Voo1, S Kumaresan, N Yoganandan, F A Pintar, J F Cusick.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Moment-rotation responses and disc anulus stresses of intact and facetectomized C4-C6 cervical spinal units were analyzed using detailed, three-dimensional, finite element models.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate biomechanical effects of progressive unilateral and bilateral facet resections on cervical spine segmental mobility (external response) and disc anulus stress (internal response). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Experimental studies have demonstrated that facetectomy significantly increases segmental mobility of the cervical spine. The biomechanical effects of facetectomy on the internal response, however, have not been investigated.
METHODS: Moment-rotation responses of C4 with respect to C6 and von Mises stress in the disc anulus were examined using finite element models of a 0% (intact), 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% unilaterally and bilaterally facetectomized cervical spinal unit. The model simulations were conducted under the pure-moment loading of 1.8 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. The intact model also was validated experimentally under the same conditions.
RESULTS: The moment-rotation responses of the intact unit were within the ranges of experimental data. Cervical rotations increased with the increased degree of facet resection. The greatest change occurred between 50% and 75% facet resections in bilateral facetectomy. Similar patterns were found for disc anulus stresses, but to a greater extent. The maximum increase in rotation (11%) and in anulus stress (30%) occurred in lateral bending. Torsion was the least affected loading mode. The effects of unilateral facetectomy were considerably less than those of 75% bilateral facetectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Facetectomy has a greater effect on anulus stress than on intervertebral joint stiffness. Significant increase in anulus stresses and segmental mobility may occur when bilateral facet resection exceeds 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152445     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of biomechanical mechanisms of whiplash injury from rear impacts.

Authors:  A F Tencer; P Huber; S K Mirza
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Surgical strategies for removal of intra- and extraforaminal dumbbell-shaped schwannomas in the subaxial cervical spine.

Authors:  Bon Sub Gu; Jin Hoon Park; Sung Woo Roh; Sang Ryong Jeon; Jun-Won Jang; Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung Chul Rhim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Excision of a centrally based ventral intradural extramedullary tumor of the cervical spine through a direct posterior approach.

Authors:  Alexander Ghasem; Joseph P Gjolaj; Dylan N Greif; Barth A Green
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-12-15

6.  Minimally invasive surgery for osteoid osteoma of the cervical spine using microendoscopic discectomy system.

Authors:  Yukako Nakamura; Shoji Yabuki; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-05-22

7.  Differences between Cervical Schwannomas of the Anterior and Posterior Nerve Roots in Relation to the Incidence of Postoperative Radicular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi; Koichi Iwatsuki; Toshika Ohkawa; Koshi Ninomiya; Takashi Moriwaki; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of the adjacent segments after minimally invasive cervical surgeries versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element study.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Chen-Xi Yuchi; Ziwei Gao; Xinlong Ma; Dong Zhao; Jun-Wei Li; Baoshan Xu; Chun-Qiu Zhang; Zheng Wang; Cheng-Fei Du; Qiang Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Biomechanical Study of Cervical Posterior Decompression.

Authors:  Akira Hashiguchi; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Norihiro Nishida; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

10.  Surgical management of spinal meningiomas: A retrospective case analysis based on preoperative surgical grade.

Authors:  Hironori Arima; Toshihiro Takami; Toru Yamagata; Kentaro Naito; Junya Abe; Nobuyuki Shimokawa; Kenji Ohata
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.