STUDY DESIGN: Compression onset rate, anatomic aspects, and morphologic and neurophysiologic effects in spinal nerve roots were studied in a nerve root compression model in pigs. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the compression onset rate by measuring the gradual reduction of the inner diameter of the constrictor, the motor nerve conduction velocity by electromyography, the morphologic changes by light microscopy, and the gross and vascular anatomy by dissection and ink injections, respectively, in a model for experimental chronic nerve root compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic nerve root compression is recognized to be related to back pain syndromes, including sciatica. Various aspects of morphologic and physiologic changes have been studied previously in models for acute compression and chronic nerve root irritation, but a controlled, graded chronic nerve root compression model has not been described. METHODS: An ameroid constrictor was applied around a spinal nerve root just cranial to the dorsal root ganglion. The inner diameter of this constrictor gradually becomes reduced. After 1 week or 4 weeks, electromyographic measurements were performed, and tissue samples were harvested for histologic analyses. The gross and vascular anatomy of the pigs' spinal nerve roots were studied by dissection and ink injections. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the nerve conduction velocity in compressed compared with noncompressed spinal nerve roots after 1 week and after 4 weeks. The ameroid constrictors induced nerve fiber damage, endoneural hyperemia, bleeding, and inflammation at the compression zone. There was often a severe reduction in the number of myelinated fibers after 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: A model for controlled, chronic, partial nerve root injury using a gradual compression-onset constrictor is presented. This model allows for induction of a controlled graded chronic nerve root injury and can be used for research on basic pathophysiologic mechanisms and on the effects of various interventions on nerve root injury development.
STUDY DESIGN: Compression onset rate, anatomic aspects, and morphologic and neurophysiologic effects in spinal nerve roots were studied in a nerve root compression model in pigs. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the compression onset rate by measuring the gradual reduction of the inner diameter of the constrictor, the motor nerve conduction velocity by electromyography, the morphologic changes by light microscopy, and the gross and vascular anatomy by dissection and ink injections, respectively, in a model for experimental chronic nerve root compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic nerve root compression is recognized to be related to back pain syndromes, including sciatica. Various aspects of morphologic and physiologic changes have been studied previously in models for acute compression and chronic nerve root irritation, but a controlled, graded chronic nerve root compression model has not been described. METHODS: An ameroid constrictor was applied around a spinal nerve root just cranial to the dorsal root ganglion. The inner diameter of this constrictor gradually becomes reduced. After 1 week or 4 weeks, electromyographic measurements were performed, and tissue samples were harvested for histologic analyses. The gross and vascular anatomy of the pigs' spinal nerve roots were studied by dissection and ink injections. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the nerve conduction velocity in compressed compared with noncompressed spinal nerve roots after 1 week and after 4 weeks. The ameroid constrictors induced nerve fiber damage, endoneural hyperemia, bleeding, and inflammation at the compression zone. There was often a severe reduction in the number of myelinated fibers after 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: A model for controlled, chronic, partial nerve root injury using a gradual compression-onset constrictor is presented. This model allows for induction of a controlled graded chronic nerve root injury and can be used for research on basic pathophysiologic mechanisms and on the effects of various interventions on nerve root injury development.
Authors: Juan S Uribe; Robert E Isaacs; Jim A Youssef; Kaveh Khajavi; Jeffrey R Balzer; Adam S Kanter; Fabrice A Küelling; Mark D Peterson Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Yuichi Yoshii; Chunfeng Zhao; Kristin D Zhao; Mark E Zobitz; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: André Luiz de Souza Grava; Luiz Fernando Ferrari; Carlos Amílcar Parada; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2015-12-12