Literature DB >> 9152283

Mechanics and energetics of nutritive sucking: a functional comparison of commercially available nipples.

S Fadavi1, I C Punwani, L Jain, D Vidyasagar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanics of sucking for 48 term infants with four different nipple units: Gerber Newborn (Gerber Products Company, Fremont, Mich.), Playtex (Playtex Products, Westport, Conn.), Evenflo (Evenflo Products Co., Canton, Ga.), and Gerber NUK. At 24 hours after birth, infants were assigned randomly to one of the nipple units and were studied twice with that nipple unit. A customized data acquisition system was used to measure and record the following variables: intraoral suction, sucking frequency, work, power, milk flow, milk volume per suck, and oxygen saturation. Although no statistically significant differences among the nipple units were noted for intraoral suction, sucking frequency, power, and oxygen saturation, the data revealed that the Playtex nipple unit was accompanied by higher peak milk flow and greater volume of milk per suck (p < 0.05). Infants fed differently with the Playtex nipple than they did with the other nipples. Our findings indicate that the Playtex nipple permits a greater milk flow in response to similar amounts of suction, work, and power when compared with others. The mean total work per such was significantly lower in the Gerber NUK group compared with the Playtex group. In addition, the total number of sucks per volume ingested was higher, and the total time to ingest a specific quantity of milk was longer for the Gerber NUK nipple.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152283     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

1.  Preliminary temporal measurement analysis of normal oropharyngeal swallowing in infants and young children.

Authors:  Julia Weckmueller; Caryn Easterling; Joan Arvedson
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Assessment of sensorial oral stimulation in infants with suck feeding disabilities.

Authors:  M E Rendón-Macías; L A Cruz-Perez; M R Mosco-Peralta; M M Saraiba-Russell; S Levi-Tajfeld; M G Morales-López
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Mechanics of sucking: comparison between bottle feeding and breastfeeding.

Authors:  Angel Moral; Ignasi Bolibar; Gloria Seguranyes; Josep M Ustrell; Gloria Sebastiá; Cristina Martínez-Barba; Jose Ríos
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Sucking versus swallowing coordination, integration, and performance in preterm and term infants.

Authors:  Christopher J Mayerl; Chloe E Edmonds; Emily A Catchpole; Alexis M Myrla; Francois D H Gould; Laura E Bond; Bethany M Stricklen; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 5.  Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants.

Authors:  Zelda Greene; Colm Pf O'Donnell; Margaret Walshe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 6.  Technological solutions and main indices for the assessment of newborns' nutritive sucking: a review.

Authors:  Eleonora Tamilia; Fabrizio Taffoni; Domenico Formica; Luca Ricci; Emiliano Schena; Flavio Keller; Eugenio Guglielmelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Sucking behaviour using feeding teats with and without an anticolic system: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Marina Kreitschmann; Lea C Epping; Ariane Hohoff; Cristina Sauerland; Thomas Stamm
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 8.  Bottle-feeding an infant feeding modality: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Judith Kotowski; Cathrine Fowler; Christina Hourigan; Fiona Orr
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.092

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.