Literature DB >> 9151588

Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results.

D L Cochran1, P V Nummikoski, F L Higginbottom, J S Hermann, S R Makins, D Buser.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated in short-term experiments that sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) titanium implant had a greater bone-to-implant contact than a titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) implant in non-oral bone. In the present study, an SLA implant was compared radiographically to a TPS implant under unloaded and loaded conditions in the canine mandible for up to 15 months. 69 implants were placed in 6 foxhounds. Standardized radiographs were taken at baseline, preload, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of loading. Loaded implants were restored with gold crowns similar to the natural dentition. Radiographic assessment of the bone response to the implants was carried out by measuring the distance between the implant shoulder and the most coronal bone-to-implant contact (DIB) and by evaluated of bone density changes using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). 5 different areas-of-interest (AOI) were defined coronally and apically along the implant. DIB measurements revealed that SLA implants had significantly less bone height loss (0.52 mm) than TPS implants (0.69 mm) at the preload evaluation (p = 0.0142) as well as at 3 months of loading (0.73 mm/1.06 mm; p = 0.0337). This difference was maintained between the implant types during the 1-year follow-up period. The same trend was also evident for CADIA measurements with SLA implants showing higher crestal bone density values when comparing preload to baseline data (p = 0.0890) and 3 months to baseline data (p = 0.0912). No measurable bone density changes were apparent in the apical areas of either implant. These results suggest that SLA implants are superior to TPS implants as measured radiographically in oral bone under unloaded and loaded conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9151588     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  18 in total

1.  The response of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells to micro- and nano-textured, hydrophilic and bioactive titanium surfaces.

Authors:  S Lumetti; E Manfredi; S Ferraris; S Spriano; G Passeri; G Ghiacci; G Macaluso; C Galli
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Rolando A Gittens; Jennifer M Schneider; Sharon L Hyzy; David A Haithcock; Peter F Ullrich; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Surface modification of titanium by hydrothermal treatment in Mg-containing solution and early osteoblast responses.

Authors:  Xingling Shi; Masaharu Nakagawa; Giichiro Kawachi; Lingli Xu; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Osteoblast response to titanium surfaces functionalized with extracellular matrix peptide biomimetics.

Authors:  B F Bell; M Schuler; S Tosatti; M Textor; Z Schwartz; B D Boyan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  The roles of Wnt signaling modulators Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) and Dickkopf-2 (Dkk2) and cell maturation state in osteogenesis on microstructured titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon Hyzy; Marco Wieland; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Daphne L Hutton; Christopher P Erdman; Marco Wieland; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Rough titanium alloys regulate osteoblast production of angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Rolando A Gittens; Jennifer M Schneider; David A Haithcock; Peter F Ullrich; Paul J Slosar; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Alveolar bone regeneration for immediate implant placement using an injectable bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Damien Boix; Olivier Gauthier; Jérôme Guicheux; Paul Pilet; Pierre Weiss; Gaël Grimandi; Guy Daculsi
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Developing a new dental implant design and comparing its biomechanical features with four designs.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Reza Birang; Mahdi Shahmoradi; Hassan Talebi; Reza Jabar Zare
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2010

10.  Human osteoblast cell spreading and vinculin expression upon biomaterial surfaces.

Authors:  Maria Ann Woodruff; Peter Jones; David Farrar; David M Grant; Colin A Scotchford
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.