OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify risk markers associated with the provision of new restorations in children and to investigate whether the carious status of a tooth surface is associated with the restorative decisions of dentists. METHODS: A total of 911 schoolchildren in grades one, two, and three were randomly selected from the island of Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dental examinations were carried out in 1990, 1991, and 1992. Tooth surfaces of first permanent molars were classified as sound, noncavitated, and cavitated. The carious status of a tooth was matched with restorative decisions reported to the insurance board. RESULTS: The presence of a carious cavity was a strong risk marker for placement of new restorations (odds rations > or = 4.11). After one year, less than 2 percent of sound tooth surfaces of first permanent molars were restored and about 21 percent of noncavitated tooth surfaces were restored. When new class I restorations placed in maxillary first permanent molars within 3-6 months after the baseline examination were evaluated, we found that between 73 percent and 86 percent of these new restorations were placed in sound or noncavitated tooth surfaces. A similar trend also was observed in mandibular first permanent molars. Poor agreement between epidemiologic diagnosis and restorative decisions was found. The restorative profile of dentists was a significant risk marker for placement of new restorations. CONCLUSION: The majority of new restorations in first permanent molars were placed in sound and noncavitated tooth surfaces because of the ubiquitous prevalence of these tooth surfaces and the validity problems of current caries diagnosis methods.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify risk markers associated with the provision of new restorations in children and to investigate whether the carious status of a tooth surface is associated with the restorative decisions of dentists. METHODS: A total of 911 schoolchildren in grades one, two, and three were randomly selected from the island of Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dental examinations were carried out in 1990, 1991, and 1992. Tooth surfaces of first permanent molars were classified as sound, noncavitated, and cavitated. The carious status of a tooth was matched with restorative decisions reported to the insurance board. RESULTS: The presence of a carious cavity was a strong risk marker for placement of new restorations (odds rations > or = 4.11). After one year, less than 2 percent of sound tooth surfaces of first permanent molars were restored and about 21 percent of noncavitated tooth surfaces were restored. When new class I restorations placed in maxillary first permanent molars within 3-6 months after the baseline examination were evaluated, we found that between 73 percent and 86 percent of these new restorations were placed in sound or noncavitated tooth surfaces. A similar trend also was observed in mandibular first permanent molars. Poor agreement between epidemiologic diagnosis and restorative decisions was found. The restorative profile of dentists was a significant risk marker for placement of new restorations. CONCLUSION: The majority of new restorations in first permanent molars were placed in sound and noncavitated tooth surfaces because of the ubiquitous prevalence of these tooth surfaces and the validity problems of current caries diagnosis methods.