Literature DB >> 9149643

Getting the most from review articles: a guide for readers and writers.

A F Shaughnessy1, D C Slawson.   

Abstract

A good medical review article is easily readable and pares down the seemingly overwhelming amount of information available in the literature. The research experience and clinical expertise of the writer do not guarantee valid and relevant recommendations. Uncritical acceptance of information by readers further potentiates the dissemination of misinformation. Only through teamwork, with each partner--both writer and reader--taking responsibility for a role, can review articles result in improved patient care. This article offers guidance to both consumers and producers--readers and writers-of review articles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9149643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  3 in total

1.  Searching for reviews.

Authors:  L Dunikowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effectiveness of Remote Intensive Counseling Versus Outpatient Counseling in Substance Use Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Armand Ntchana; Ricky Daley
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

3.  Appropriate roles for the subscriber, publisher, editor, author, and reviewer in the archives of plastic surgery.

Authors:  Kun Hwang
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-11-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.