Literature DB >> 9148977

Computed tomography in the emergency department.

J Sosna1, B S Slasky, J Bar-Ziv.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine parameters indicating the current use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED). Computerized data regarding patients seen in the ED between 1/1/92 and 9/30/95 were retrieved. A rate of 36/1,000 patients underwent CT in the ED (ED CT). Of patients eventually hospitalized, 6.04% had ED CT, whereas 2.81% of the discharged patients had undergone ED CT (P < .001). The most common region examined by ED CT was the head (55.38%), followed by the abdomen (14.19%), pelvis (11.96%), spine (11.46%), and chest (5.57%). The hospitalization rates for patients undergoing head and spine ED CT were 35.99% and 36.84%, respectively. The hospitalization rates for patients undergoing abdomen, pelvis, and chest ED CT were 50.76%, 51.46%, and 55.61%, respectively. The mean number of patients undergoing ED CT increased according to age with a positive linear correlation. Head CT was most common in the very young and the very old. Some parameters about the use of ED CT were identified. The information obtained will allow comparison of practice between EDs in different medical centers and will be useful to hospital administrators, health planners, and clinicians. This retrospective analysis is to be followed by more comprehensive prospective studies involving different EDs in various sections of the country.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9148977     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

1.  Clinical impact of computed tomography in the emergency department in nontraumatic chest and abdominal conditions.

Authors:  Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Matteo Brambati; Carmelo Messina; Giovanni Mauri; Giovanni Di Leo; Enzo Silvestri; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-03-13

2.  Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast.

Authors:  Ly N Huynh; Bret F Coughlin; Jeannette Wolfe; Fidela Blank; Steve Y Lee; Howard A Smithline
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-29

3.  Computed tomography utilization rates after the placement of a scanner in an emergency department: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Daniel Runde; Kaushal Shah; Leily Naraghi; Brandon Godbout; Jonathan Kirschner; David Newman; Dan Wiener; Jarone Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-04-12

4.  Advanced radiology utilization in a tertiary care emergency department from 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Shin Ahn; Won Young Kim; Kyung Soo Lim; Seung Mok Ryoo; Chang Hwan Sohn; Dong Woo Seo; Myoung Kwan Kwak; Jae Chol Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Generalist versus Abdominal Subspecialist Radiologist Interpretations of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Performed on Patients with Abdominal Pain and its Impact on the Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Hasan Yesilagac; Ilker Murat Arer; Betul Gulalp; Hakan Yabanoglu; Ozlem Karagun; Elif Karadeli
Journal:  Adv J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.