BACKGROUND: Acute reactions of oral mucosa are a frequent side effect of radiotherapy, which often necessitates interruption of the treatment. Marked proliferation of tumor stem cells during treatment interruptions may occur in squamous cell carcinomata, which represent the majority of tumors in the head and neck area. Hence a fatal consequence of treatment breaks may be a significant decrease in tumor cure rates. Furthermore, marked acute responses frequently result in increased late sequelae ("consequential damage"). Therefore, amelioration of the mucosal response aiming at avoiding treatment breaks and at reduction of late reactions could definitely increase the therapeutic success of radiation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Various possibilities for the therapeutic management of radiation-induced oral mucositis with a symptomatic or radio- and epithelial biological background are summarized and presented systematically. RESULTS: A variety of prophylactic and therapeutic methods have been proposed for the management of acute radiation reactions of the oral mucosa. Frequently, their efficacy has been established for chemotherapy or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. Hence, systematical rather than local effects have to be considered. CONCLUSIONS: In general, prophylaxis of oral mucositis is mainly based on dental restoration or edentation, in combination with frequent oral hygienic measures after the meals and with antiseptic mouthwashes. Intensive personal care is recommended. The necessity of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostoma is dependent on the status of the patient and on size and localization of the treatment area, i.e. the impairment of food uptake which is to be expected. Therapeutic intervention is restricted to local or systemic treatment of pain and local application of antimycotics and antibiotics.
BACKGROUND: Acute reactions of oral mucosa are a frequent side effect of radiotherapy, which often necessitates interruption of the treatment. Marked proliferation of tumor stem cells during treatment interruptions may occur in squamous cell carcinomata, which represent the majority of tumors in the head and neck area. Hence a fatal consequence of treatment breaks may be a significant decrease in tumor cure rates. Furthermore, marked acute responses frequently result in increased late sequelae ("consequential damage"). Therefore, amelioration of the mucosal response aiming at avoiding treatment breaks and at reduction of late reactions could definitely increase the therapeutic success of radiation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Various possibilities for the therapeutic management of radiation-induced oral mucositis with a symptomatic or radio- and epithelial biological background are summarized and presented systematically. RESULTS: A variety of prophylactic and therapeutic methods have been proposed for the management of acute radiation reactions of the oral mucosa. Frequently, their efficacy has been established for chemotherapy or in combination with other immunosuppressive treatments. Hence, systematical rather than local effects have to be considered. CONCLUSIONS: In general, prophylaxis of oral mucositis is mainly based on dental restoration or edentation, in combination with frequent oral hygienic measures after the meals and with antiseptic mouthwashes. Intensive personal care is recommended. The necessity of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostoma is dependent on the status of the patient and on size and localization of the treatment area, i.e. the impairment of food uptake which is to be expected. Therapeutic intervention is restricted to local or systemic treatment of pain and local application of antimycotics and antibiotics.
Authors: G Ciais; M Namer; M Schneider; F Demard; N Pourreau-Schneider; P M Martin; M Soudry; J C Franquin; H Zattara Journal: Bull Cancer Date: 1992 Impact factor: 1.276
Authors: N Nicolopoulos; A Mantidis; E Stathopoulos; S Papaodysseas; J Kouvaris; H Varveris; C Papavasiliou Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1985-01 Impact factor: 6.280