Literature DB >> 9148093

Comparison of critical speed determined from track running and treadmill tests in elite runners.

K J Kranenburg1, D J Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare critical speed determined from a field test of maximal effort runs between 3 and 15 min on a running track and a laboratory test of high-speed runs on a treadmill with a 10-km criterion performance. Nine highly trained male runners (VO ++(2max) 67.7 +/- 4.1 ml*kg*min(-1)) participated in the study. Critical speed was determined from three maximal runs (907, 2267.5, and 4081.5 m) on a 453.5-m indoor running track and from three high speed runs on a treadmill. The treadmill speeds were individualized so that exhaustion was reached in approximately 3, 7, and 13 min. All subjects participated in a 10-km cross-country race (measured distance 9.8 km) on a flat and dry course. Track critical speed (293 m*min(-1)) was correlated (r = 0.92, P < 0.001) with race speed (293 m*min(-1)), whereas treadmill critical speed (300 m*min(-1)) had the same correlation but over predicted race performance. It was concluded that although both tests were correlated with 9.8-km race performance, track-determined critical speed was easy to administer with highly trained runners and was very similar to 10-km race speed.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9148093     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199605000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methods to determine aerobic endurance.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Luc Léger; Patrick Legros
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Physiological responses at five estimates of critical velocity.

Authors:  Anthony J Bull; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Sharon R Rana
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Vmax estimate from three-parameter critical velocity models: validity and impact on 800 m running performance prediction.

Authors:  Laurent Bosquet; Antoine Duchene; François Lecot; Grégory Dupont; Luc Leger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The reliability of the intermittent critical velocity test and assessment of critical rest interval in men and women.

Authors:  David H Fukuda; Abbie E Smith; Kristina L Kendall; Robert P Hetrick; Ryan L Hames; Joel T Cramer; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  A critical review of critical power.

Authors:  Raffy Dotan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Running in the wild: Energetics explain ecological running speeds.

Authors:  Jessica C Selinger; Jennifer L Hicks; Rachel W Jackson; Cara M Wall-Scheffler; Derek Chang; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 10.900

7.  Is the critical running speed related to the intermittent maximal lactate steady state?

Authors:  Ricardo D de Lucas; Naiandra Dittrich; Rubens B Junior; Kristopher M de Souza; Luiz Guilherme A Guglielmo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Peak Running Velocity or Critical Speed Under Field Conditions: Which Best Predicts 5-km Running Performance in Recreational Runners?

Authors:  Diogo Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Diego Hilgemberg Figueiredo; Francisco de Assis Manoel; Fabiana Andrade Machado
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Physiological differences between a noncontinuous and a continuous endurance training protocol in recreational runners and metabolic demand prediction.

Authors:  Muhammad J Ali; Govindasamy Balasekaran; Hoon Kay Hiang; Gerald Seet Gim Lee
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-12

10.  Calculation of Critical Speed from Raw Training Data in Recreational Marathon Runners.

Authors:  Barry Smyth; Daniel Muniz-Pumares
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.