Literature DB >> 9147604

Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.

D A Bloch1.   

Abstract

Methods are proposed for comparing two diagnostic tests for the same data where a threshold for positive for each test is specified. One method contrasts the diagnostic tests' estimated risks. A second method compares the two tests' kappa coefficients. When thresholds for positive test results are specified a priori, maximum likelihood estimators and their asymptotic variances are derived and test statistics are presented for both case-control and naturalistic methods of sampling. The bootstrap is proposed as a method to assess differences in risk estimators when thresholds for positive test results are chosen by scanning the data. Examples are given to illustrate the methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9147604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Appraisal of immunoglobulin free light chain as a marker of response.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; Lijun Zhang; Jerry A Katzmann; Melissa Snyder; Emily Blood; Roberta Degoey; Kimberly Henderson; Robert A Kyle; Martin M Oken; Arthur R Bradwell; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The Duesseldorf warning signs for primary immunodeficiency: is it time to change the rules?

Authors:  Petra Lankisch; Julia Schiffner; Sujal Ghosh; Florian Babor; Arndt Borkhardt; Hans-Jürgen Laws
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Change in CA 19-9 levels after chemoradiotherapy predicts survival in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gary Y Yang; Nadia K Malik; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Wen-Wee Ma; Leayn Flaherty; Renuka Iyer; Boris Kuvshinoff; John Gibbs; Gregory Wilding; Graham Warren; Kilian Salerno May
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12

4.  Melissococcus plutonius Can Be Effectively and Economically Detected Using Hive Debris and Conventional PCR.

Authors:  Jana Biová; Jean-Daniel Charrière; Silvie Dostálková; Mária Škrabišová; Marek Petřivalský; Jaroslav Bzdil; Jiří Danihlík
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.

Authors:  Stylianos Tsapakis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Andreas Diagourtas; Stylianos Kandarakis; Konstantinos Droutsas; Konstantinos Andreanos; Dimitrios Brouzas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-12

6.  A Software Tool for Calculating the Uncertainty of Diagnostic Accuracy Measures.

Authors:  Theodora Chatzimichail; Aristides T Hatjimihail
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 7.  A scoping review of autoantibodies as biomarkers for canine autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Amy E Treeful; Emily L Coffey; Steven G Friedenberg
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.