Literature DB >> 9147595

Transformations to additivity in measurement error models.

R S Eckert1, R J Carroll, N Wang.   

Abstract

In many problems, one wants to model the relationship between a response Y and a covariate X. Sometimes it is difficult, expensive, or even impossible to observe X directly, but one can instead observe a substitute variable W that is easier to obtain. By far, the most common model for the relationship between the actual covariate of interest X and the substitute W is W = X + U, where the variable U represents measurement error. This assumption of additive measurement error may be unreasonable for certain data sets. We propose a new model, namely h(W) = h(X) + U, where h(.) is a monotone transformation function selected from some family H of monotone functions. The idea of the new model is that, in the correct scale, measurement error is additive. We propose two possible transformation families H. One is based on selecting a transformation that makes the within-sample mean and standard deviation of replicated W's uncorrelated. The second is based on selecting the transformation so that the errors (U's) fit a prespecified distribution. Transformation families used are the parametric power transformations and a cubic spline family. Several data examples are presented to illustrate the methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9147595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Estimation via corrected scores in general semiparametric regression models with error-prone covariates.

Authors:  Arnab Maity; Tatiyana V Apanasovich
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.125

2.  Spatial measurement error and correction by spatial SIMEX in linear regression models when using predicted air pollution exposures.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Raymond J Carroll; Brent Coull
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  Assessment of bias in experimentally measured diffusion tensor imaging parameters using SIMEX.

Authors:  Carolyn B Lauzon; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Brian C Caffo; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Bayesian Semiparametric Density Deconvolution in the Presence of Conditionally Heteroscedastic Measurement Errors.

Authors:  Abhra Sarkar; Bani K Mallick; John Staudenmayer; Debdeep Pati; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.302

6.  Quantile Regression With Measurement Error.

Authors:  Ying Wei; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Split and combine simulation extrapolation algorithm to correct geocoding coarsening of built environment exposures.

Authors:  Jung Y Won; Emma V Sanchez-Vaznaugh; Yuqi Zhai; Brisa N Sánchez
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Intake_epis_food(): An R Function for Fitting a Bivariate Nonlinear Measurement Error Model to Estimate Usual and Energy Intake for Episodically Consumed Foods.

Authors:  Adriana Pérez; Saijuan Zhang; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Modeling data with excess zeros and measurement error: application to evaluating relationships between episodically consumed foods and health outcomes.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Dennis W Buckman; Kevin W Dodd; Patricia M Guenther; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Janet A Tooze; Raymond J Carroll; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Robust methods to correct for measurement error when evaluating a surrogate marker.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tanya P Garcia; Ross L Prentice; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.701

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.