Literature DB >> 9147172

Family and physicians' views of surrogate decision-making: the roles and how to choose.

M Silberfeld1, R Grundstein-Amado, D Stephens, R Deber.   

Abstract

Physicians and family members were compared on the roles played in surrogate decision-making and their views as to how choices should be made by surrogate decision-makers. Thirty-six family members of patients with Alzheimer's disease, 35 family members of patients with schizophrenia, and 34 physicians from a diversity of specialties were the respondents. There was general agreement that shared decision-making was preferred. Physicians seem to make surrogate decisions in accordance with contemporary views about their roles. Families believed they had a strong subjective appreciation of the patient's overall good. The burden of decision-making was greater for families, but that depended to some degree on the diagnosis of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship; Toronto

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9147172     DOI: 10.1017/s1041610296002906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr        ISSN: 1041-6102            Impact factor:   3.878


  4 in total

Review 1.  Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Patient Preferences and Surrogate Decision Making in Neuroscience Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Xuemei Cai; Jennifer Robinson; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Douglas B White; Robert G Holloway; Kevin N Sheth; Liana Fraenkel; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yen-Ko Lin; Kuan-Ting Liu; Chao-Wen Chen; Wei-Che Lee; Chia-Ju Lin; Leiyu Shi; Yin-Chun Tien
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Variability of Prognostic Communication in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Connie Ge; Adeline L Goss; Sybil Crawford; Kelsey Goostrey; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Anne-Marie Shields; Catherine L Hough; Bernard Lo; Shannon S Carson; Jay Steingrub; Douglas B White; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.