Literature DB >> 9146699

Cells at intermediate oxygen levels can be more important than the "hypoxic fraction" in determining tumor response to fractionated radiotherapy.

B G Wouters1, J M Brown.   

Abstract

The presence of hypoxic cells in human tumors is thought to be one of the principal reasons for the failure of radiation therapy. Intensive laboratory and clinical efforts to overcome tumor hypoxia have focused on oxygenating, radiosensitizing or killing the maximally radioresistant fraction of tumor cells. This "hypoxic fraction" dominates the single-dose radiation response, irrespective of the oxygenation status of the remainder of the tumor cell population. However, at doses that are typical of those delivered in a daily radiotherapy protocol, we show that the tumor response is highly dependent upon the cells at oxygen levels intermediate between fully oxygenated and hypoxic (0.5-20 mm Hg). For most tumors, these cells are more important than the radiobiologically hypoxic cells in determining treatment outcome after 30 fractions of 2 Gy. We also show that under conditions of diffusion-limited hypoxia, the impact of full reoxygenation between fractions is much smaller than previously realized. Together, the results imply that tumor hypoxia plays a more significant role in determining the outcome of fractionated radiotherapy than previous measurements and assumptions of hypoxic fractions have indicated. Therefore, the concept of a hypoxic fraction in human tumors is less meaningful when pertaining to a fractionated radiotherapy regimen, and should not be expected to be useful for predicting tumor responses in the clinic. This implies the need to characterize tumor oxygenation in a manner that reflects the true oxygenation status of all the tumor cells, not just the ones most refractory to the effects of ionizing radiation. Furthermore, effective therapeutic agents must have the ability to specifically sensitize or kill those cells at intermediate levels of oxygen in addition to the radiobiologically hypoxic cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9146699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  74 in total

1.  DNA damage measured by the comet assay in head and neck cancer patients treated with tirapazamine.

Authors:  M J Dorie; M S Kovacs; E C Gabalski; M Adam; Q T Le; D A Bloch; H A Pinto; D J Terris; J M Brown
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Causes and effects of heterogeneous perfusion in tumors.

Authors:  R J Gillies; P A Schornack; T W Secomb; N Raghunand
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Killing of brain tumor cells by hypoxia-responsive element mediated expression of BAX.

Authors:  H Ruan; J Wang; L Hu; C S Lin; K R Lamborn; D F Deen
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Hypofractionation results in reduced tumor cell kill compared to conventional fractionation for tumors with regions of hypoxia.

Authors:  David J Carlson; Paul J Keall; Billy W Loo; Zhe J Chen; J Martin Brown
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Modeling Cellular Response in Large-Scale Radiogenomic Databases to Advance Precision Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Venkata Sk Manem; Meghan Lambie; Ian Smith; Petr Smirnov; Victor Kofia; Mark Freeman; Marianne Koritzinsky; Mohamed E Abazeed; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Scott V Bratman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases are linked to metastases in primary cervical cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Young Kim; Hye-Jin Shin; Tae-Hyun Kim; Kwan-Ho Cho; Kyung-Hwan Shin; Bu-Kyoung Kim; Ju-Won Roh; Sun Lee; Sang-Yoon Park; You-Jin Hwang; Inn-Oc Han
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Linear quadratic and tumour control probability modelling in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  S F C O'Rourke; H McAneney; T Hillen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Both microtubule-stabilizing and microtubule-destabilizing drugs inhibit hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha accumulation and activity by disrupting microtubule function.

Authors:  Daniel Escuin; Erik R Kline; Paraskevi Giannakakou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Detection of hypoxia in human brain tumor xenografts using a modified comet assay.

Authors:  Jingli Wang; Jack Klem; Jan B Wyrick; Tomoko Ozawa; Erin Cunningham; Jay Golinveaux; Max J Allen; Kathleen R Lamborn; Dennis F Deen
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Potential role of the glycolytic oscillator in acute hypoxia in tumors.

Authors:  Leonard Che Fru; Erin B Adamson; David D Campos; Sean B Fain; Steven L Jacques; Albert J van der Kogel; Kwang P Nickel; Chihwa Song; Randall J Kimple; Michael W Kissick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.