Literature DB >> 9146608

Prostate specific antigen in benign prostatic hyperplasia: purification and characterization.

Z Chen1, H Chen, T A Stamey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The ratio of free-to-total prostate specific antigen (PSA) in serum is greater in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) than in those with prostate cancer, and it provides a means of partially discriminating these 2 diseases. To understand the molecular mechanism of why the free-to-total PSA ratio is greater in BPH than in prostate cancer we analyzed PSA obtained directly from nodules of BPH tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PSA from BPH nodule fluids was first purified by gel filtration and ion exchange chromatography. Purified BPH PSA was characterized by gel electrophoresis, enzyme assay and N-terminal sequence analysis of the amino acids.
RESULTS: A single band at 30 kDa. on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions was identical to that of seminal fluid PSA. Under reducing conditions most BPH PSA was degraded, whereas most seminal fluid PSA existed as an intact molecule. BPH PSA had multiple internal cleavages in addition to the common cleavage site between lysines 145 and 146 of seminal fluid PSA. Cleavage sites at C-terminals of histidine 54 and phenylalanine 57 were also detected. Enzymatic activity studies with different substrates showed that PSA from seminal fluid and BPH nodules had similar specific trypsin-like activity. However, BPH PSA had much lower specific chymotrypsin-like activity than seminal fluid PSA. N-terminal sequence analysis showed that BPH PSA was neither in the pre-proenzyme form (261 amino acids) nor the zymogen proenzyme form (244 amino acids) of PSA, both of which are known precursors of mature PSA (237 amino acids).
CONCLUSIONS: Most PSA in BPH nodules is in the nicked form with low chymotrypsin-like activity. When it leaks into the circulation it will form fewer PSA-antichymotrypsin complexes and more will remain in the free form. We predict that a protease with trypsin-like activity in BPH nodule fluid is probably responsible for the nicked form of BPH PSA. These findings suggest that antibodies produced against PSA in BPH nodules may be useful in discriminating prostate cancer from BPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9146608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Enzymes and related proteins as cancer biomarkers: a proteomic approach.

Authors:  Shu-Ling Liang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Twenty Years of PSA: From Prostate Antigen to Tumor Marker.

Authors:  Gabriela De Angelis; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; L Blair Shamel; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Immunoassay for the discrimination of free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) forms with internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆) from fPSA without internal cleavages at Lys(₁₄₅) or Lys(₁₄₆).

Authors:  Mari T Peltola; Pauliina Niemelä; Kalle Alanen; Martti Nurmi; Hans Lilja; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Human seminal proteinase and prostate-specific antigen are the same protein.

Authors:  Abdul Waheed; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan; Robert L Van Etten; Faizan Ahmad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 6.  [Isoforms of free prostate-specific antigen].

Authors:  A Haese; J Noldus; T Steuber; H Huland; H Lilja
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  A Magnetic Bead-Based Sensor for the Quantification of Multiple Prostate Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Zuxiong Chen; Lingyun Xu; Rosalie Nolley; Edwin Chang; Breeana Mitchell; James D Brooks; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular Form Differences Between Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Standards Create Quantitative Discordances in PSA ELISA Measurements.

Authors:  Erica L McJimpsey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Molecular diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo I Canto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Multi-lectin Affinity Chromatography and Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveal Differential Glycoform Levels between Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Sera.

Authors:  Sarah M Totten; Ravali Adusumilli; Majlinda Kullolli; Cheylene Tanimoto; James D Brooks; Parag Mallick; Sharon J Pitteri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.