OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether the association between workplace conditions and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and acute myocardial infarction differed by socioeconomic status. METHODS: Prospective data were used to examine these associations in 2297 Finnish men, with adjustment for prevalent diseases and biological, behavioral, and psychosocial covariates, and stratified by employment status and workplace social support. RESULTS: Elevated age-adjusted relative hazards for all-cause mortality were found for men who reported high demands, low resources, and low income; high demands, high resources, and low income; and low demands, high resources, and low income. Similar patterns were found for cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, elevated age-adjusted relative hazards for acute myocardial infarction were observed only in men who reported high demands, low resources, and low income. These results did not differ by level of workplace social support or employment status. CONCLUSIONS: The negative effects of workplace conditions on mortality and of myocardial infarction risk depended on income level and were largely mediated by known risk factors.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether the association between workplace conditions and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and acute myocardial infarction differed by socioeconomic status. METHODS: Prospective data were used to examine these associations in 2297 Finnish men, with adjustment for prevalent diseases and biological, behavioral, and psychosocial covariates, and stratified by employment status and workplace social support. RESULTS: Elevated age-adjusted relative hazards for all-cause mortality were found for men who reported high demands, low resources, and low income; high demands, high resources, and low income; and low demands, high resources, and low income. Similar patterns were found for cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, elevated age-adjusted relative hazards for acute myocardial infarction were observed only in men who reported high demands, low resources, and low income. These results did not differ by level of workplace social support or employment status. CONCLUSIONS: The negative effects of workplace conditions on mortality and of myocardial infarction risk depended on income level and were largely mediated by known risk factors.
Authors: Akseli Aittomäki; Eero Lahelma; Ossi Rahkonen; Päivi Leino-Arjas; Pekka Martikainen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-03-08 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Anne Kouvonen; Mika Kivimäki; Marianna Virtanen; Jaana Pentti; Jussi Vahtera Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: I Andersen; H Burr; T S Kristensen; M Gamborg; M Osler; E Prescott; F Diderichsen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Niklas Krause; Richard J Brand; Jussi Kauhanen; George A Kaplan; S Leonard Syme; Candice C Wong; Jukka T Salonen Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 2.830