Literature DB >> 9145979

Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy.

D E Novicki1, T R Larson, P E Andrews, S K Swanson, R G Ferrigni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the Vest and direct vesicourethral anastomosis for radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: Five hundred six patients who underwent consecutive radical prostatectomies at our institution were analyzed. Two hundred fifty-nine patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis using the Vest technique and 247 underwent a direct suture anastomosis. The groups were analyzed relative to time until healing, the occurrence of anastomotic strictures, and the continence rate 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS: Approximately twice as many patients who underwent the Vest procedure experienced delayed healing and 8.5% developed anastomotic strictures compared with 1.2% of the direct anastomosis group. The Vest group experienced slightly better urinary continence 1 year postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The Vest procedure is a reasonable alternative to direct anastomosis for radical prostatectomy and provides similar results. We suggest specific circumstances when the Vest anastomosis may be particularly useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145979     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  1 in total

1.  Early Continence and Extravasation After Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy - Interrupted vs Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Frank Friedersdorff; Nora Köhler; Nasrin El-Bandar; Andreas Maxeiner; Bernhard Ralla; Kurt Miller
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.423

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.