Literature DB >> 9145132

The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on a burn wound model in human volunteers.

J A Niezgoda1, P Cianci, B W Folden, R L Ortega, J B Slade, A B Storrow.   

Abstract

A previous nonblinded study has suggested beneficial effects from hyperbaric oxygen treatment of superficial partial-thickness radiation burns in human volunteers. This protocol was designed to either confirm or challenge these previous findings in a randomized, blinded format. Twelve healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (7 males, 5 females) participated. All were screened for contraindications to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (acute sinusitis, otitis media, pneumonia, pregnancy, active cancer, pneumothorax) and given a single test hyperbaric exposure. A standardized wound model was employed for the painless creation of a volar forearm lesion on volunteers by applying a suction device to form a blister, excising its epidermal roof, and irradiating the exposed dermis with ultraviolet light. Subjects were randomized into either a hyperbaric oxygen group (100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA, n = 6) or the sea-level air-breathing equivalent control group (8.75% oxygen at 2.4 ATA, n = 6). Both groups then underwent standard hyperbaric therapy. The subjects, the hyperbaric oxygen chamber operators, and the monitoring clinicians were all blinded to the oxygen concentration administered. Each subject received two dives per day over a 3-day period. The wounds were studied noninvasively prior to treatment and once per day over 6 days for size, hyperemia, and exudation, with epithelialization as the endpoint. The averages for each measurement of the hyperbaric oxygen group versus the control group were computed by means of a one-tail t test; p was considered significant at less than 0.05. Daily wound size, hyperemia, and exudation measurements were significantly different on day 2. The hyperbaric oxygen group showed a 42 percent reduction in wound hyperemia, a 35 percent reduction in the size of the lesion, and a 22 percent reduction in wound exudation (p values of 0.05, 0.03, and 0.04, respectively). No significant difference was noted for epithelialization. Observed differences in wound size, hyperemia, and exudation were attributable to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This study further supports earlier conclusions that hyperbaric oxygen therapy is beneficial in a superficial dermal wound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on burn wound conversion-A review of recent advances in understanding the secondary progressions of burns.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Angelica Tan Del Rosario; Lucio De Almeida Moura Severo; Long Nguyen; Derek A Banyard; Jason D Toranto; Gregory R D Evans; Alan D Widgerow
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Topical oxygen therapy induces vascular endothelial growth factor expression and improves closure of clinically presented chronic wounds.

Authors:  Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Savita Khanna; Richard Schlanger; Sorabh Khandelwal; Gary Phillips; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 2.557

Review 3.  The History and Development of Hyperbaric Oxygenation (HBO) in Thermal Burn Injury.

Authors:  Christian Smolle; Joerg Lindenmann; Lars Kamolz; Freyja-Maria Smolle-Juettner
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 4.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for thermal burns.

Authors:  E Villanueva; M H Bennett; J Wasiak; J P Lehm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Double-blind trials in hyperbaric medicine: A narrative review on past experiences and considerations in designing sham hyperbaric treatment.

Authors:  C A Lansdorp; Rob A van Hulst
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.486

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.