K J Calfas1, J F Sallis, B Oldenburg, M Ffrench. 1. University of California at San Diego, School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, La Jolla 92093, USA. kcalfas@mail.sdsu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the construct validity of a physical activity intervention in primary care by testing whether the intervention changed hypothesized mediators and whether changes in the mediators were associated with behavior change. METHODS: Matched physician offices were nonrandomly assigned to intervention or control. Apparently healthy, sedentary, adult patients (N = 255) were recruited from physician offices. The intervention was brief, behaviorally based counseling by physicians, plus a telephone follow-up 2 weeks later. Assessments of physical activity and mediators were collected at baseline and at 4- to 6-week follow-up. Hypothesized mediators were processes of change, self-efficacy, and social support for exercise. RESULTS: Patients who were counseled improved significantly more than those in the control group on behavioral and cognitive processes of change. Other changes in mediators were nonsignificant. Behavioral processes of change and self-efficacy made significant contributions to the multiple regression model explaining self-report and objective measures of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention affected some of the targeted mediators of physical activity change. Two of three mediator variables were associated with changes in physical activity regardless of experimental condition and other variables. The construct validity of the intervention was partially supported.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the construct validity of a physical activity intervention in primary care by testing whether the intervention changed hypothesized mediators and whether changes in the mediators were associated with behavior change. METHODS: Matched physician offices were nonrandomly assigned to intervention or control. Apparently healthy, sedentary, adult patients (N = 255) were recruited from physician offices. The intervention was brief, behaviorally based counseling by physicians, plus a telephone follow-up 2 weeks later. Assessments of physical activity and mediators were collected at baseline and at 4- to 6-week follow-up. Hypothesized mediators were processes of change, self-efficacy, and social support for exercise. RESULTS:Patients who were counseled improved significantly more than those in the control group on behavioral and cognitive processes of change. Other changes in mediators were nonsignificant. Behavioral processes of change and self-efficacy made significant contributions to the multiple regression model explaining self-report and objective measures of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention affected some of the targeted mediators of physical activity change. Two of three mediator variables were associated with changes in physical activity regardless of experimental condition and other variables. The construct validity of the intervention was partially supported.
Authors: Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Dawn K Wilson; Cheryl L Addy; Gwen Felton; Mary Beth Poston Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Bernice C Yates; Carol H Pullen; Jonathan Bruce Santo; Linda Boeckner; Patricia A Hageman; Paul J Dizona; Susan Noble Walker Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Eleshia J Morrison; Matthew M Clark; Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Marcelo M K Hanza; Sonja J Meiers; Christi A Patten; Jeff A Sloan; Paul J Novotny; Leslie A Sim; Julie A Nigon; Irene G Sia Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2017-06
Authors: Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Marcelo M K Hanza; Sonja J Meiers; Christi A Patten; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Paul J Novotny; Jane W Njeru; Adeline Abbenyi; James A Levine; Miriam Goodson; Maria Graciela D Porraz Capetillo; Ahmed Osman; Abdullah Hared; Julie A Nigon; Irene G Sia Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 2.226