Literature DB >> 9144347

Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss using tibolone or conventional peroral or transdermal hormone replacement therapy with 17beta-estradiol and dydrogesterone.

K Lippuner1, W Haenggi, M H Birkhaeuser, J P Casez, P Jaeger.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal bone loss can be prevented by continuous or intermittent estradiol (E2) administration. Concomitant progestogen therapy is mandatory in nonhysterectomized women to curtail the risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer. However, the recurrence of vaginal bleeding induced by sequential progestogen therapy in addition to continuous estrogen administration is one of the reasons for noncompliance to hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Tibolone, a synthetic steroid with simultaneous weak estrogenic, androgenic, and progestational activity, which does not stimulate endometrial proliferation, has recently been proposed for the treatment of climacteric symptoms. To compare the efficacy of conventional oral and transdermal HRT with that of tibolone in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss, 140 postmenopausal women (age, 52 +/- 0.6 years; median duration of menopause, 3 years) were enrolled in an open 2-year study. Volunteers had been offered a choice between HRT and no therapy (control group, CO). Patients selecting HRT were randomly allocated to one of the following three treatment groups: TIB, tibolone, 2.5 mg/day continuously, orally; PO, peroral E2, 2 mg/day continuously, plus sequential oral dydrogesterone (DYD), 10 mg/day, for 14 days of a 28-day cycle; TTS, transdermal E2 by patch releasing 50 microg/day, plus DYD as above. Bone densitometry of the lumbar spine, upper femur, and whole body was performed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, and then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after initiation of therapy. One hundred and fifteen women (82%) completed the 2 years of the study. The dropout rate was similar in each group. Over 2 years, bone preservation was observed in all three treatment groups as compared with controls, without significant differences among treatment regimens. In conclusion, tibolone can be regarded as an alternative to conventional HRT to prevent postmenopausal bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9144347     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.5.806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  6 in total

Review 1.  Estradiol and dydrogesterone. A review of their combined use as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R H Foster; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacology of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Authors:  B Haynes; M Dowsett
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Mammographic density in postmenopausal women treated with tibolone, estriol or conventional hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  I Valdivia; D Ortega
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Effects of tibolone and raloxifene on bone mineral density in osteopenic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  P D Delmas; S R Davis; J Hensen; S Adami; S van Os; E A Nijland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Effect of Tibolone on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lizett Castrejón-Delgado; Osvaldo D Castelán-Martínez; Patricia Clark; Juan Garduño-Espinosa; Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez; Martha A Sánchez-Rodríguez
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.