Literature DB >> 9144041

Skin type and optimistic bias in relation to the sun protection and suntanning behaviors of young adults.

V A Clarke1, T Williams, S Arthey.   

Abstract

The study examined the roles of general and personal beliefs and skin type in relation to suntanning and sun protection, by assessing various perceptions of risk of skin cancer both for the self and for the average person. A sample of 355 people aged 16 to 25 years was selected randomly from the telephone directory of a coastal provincial city. Highly structured interviews were conducted over the telephone. The findings were presented in relation to three research questions. First, skin type, classified as burn only, burn then tan, or tan without burning, influenced both general and personal beliefs. Compared to the tan-only group, the burn-only group perceived earlier age at onset, greater number of years of life lost, and greater severity of skin cancer, for both the average person and the self, and greater susceptibility to skin cancer for the average person. Second, differences were found between personally relevant and population-relevant beliefs on susceptibility to skin cancer, time of onset, and years of life lost due to skin cancer but not for perceptions of severity and curability. Finally, skin cancer beliefs were poor correlates of tanning and protecting behaviors. The factor explaining the greatest proportion of variance in both behaviors was skin type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9144041     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025586829179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  21 in total

1.  Changing knowledge and attitudes about skin cancer risk factors in adolescents.

Authors:  R J Mermelstein; L A Riesenberg
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Adolescent use of sun-protection measures.

Authors:  J Cockburn; D Hennrikus; R Scott; R Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1989-08-07       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Behavioural change in adolescence: a major challenge for skin-cancer control in Australia.

Authors:  R Marks; D Hill
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1988-11-21       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

5.  Psychosocial factors in sunbathing and sunscreen use.

Authors:  B Keesling; H S Friedman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

7.  Sun exposure and the risk of melanoma.

Authors:  A Green
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.875

8.  Non-melanotic skin cancer and solar keratoses in Victoria.

Authors:  R Marks; M W Ponsford; T S Selwood; G Goodman; G Mason
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983 Dec 10-24       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Pigmentary traits, ethnic origin, benign nevi, and family history as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  C D Holman; B K Armstrong
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Melanoma prevention: behavioral and nonbehavioral factors in sunburn among an Australian urban population.

Authors:  D Hill; V White; R Marks; T Theobald; R Borland; C Roy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sun exposure in young adult cancer survivors on and off the beach: results from Project REACH.

Authors:  Eric K Zwemer; Heike I M Mahler; Andrew E Werchniak; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Association Between Sun Protection Behaviors and Sunburn Among U.S. Older Adults.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Helen Ding; MaryBeth Freeman; Meredith L Shoemaker
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 3.  Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Jordana K McLoone; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-12

4.  Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Socio-Cultural Norms and Sunbathing.

Authors:  John Mingoia; Amanda Hutchinson; Carlene Wilson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-06

5.  Psychiatric and addictive symptoms of young adult female indoor tanners.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Jessye Cohen-Filipic; Susan Darlow; Jacqueline D Kloss; Sharon L Manne; Teja Munshi
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2013-04-26

6.  Unrealistic optimism and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  V A Clarke; H Lovegrove; A Williams; M Machperson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

7.  Better the devil you know? High-risk individuals' anticipated psychological responses to genetic testing for melanoma susceptibility.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Bettina Meiser; Phyllis N Butow; R F Soames Job; Graham J Mann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Sun protection attitudes and behaviours among first generation Australians with darker skin types: results from focus groups.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Alison Zucca; Irena Brozek; Vanessa Rock; Billie Bonevski
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-02

9.  Measurement of tanning dependence.

Authors:  C J Heckman; S Darlow; J D Kloss; J Cohen-Filipic; S L Manne; T Munshi; A L Yaroch; C Perlis
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  The influence of appearance, health, and future orientations on tanning behavior.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Diane B Wilson; Karen S Ingersoll
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.