Literature DB >> 9143749

Frequency effect of 0.35-1.0 Hz horizontal translational oscillation on motion sickness and the somatogravic illusion.

J F Golding1, M I Finch, J R Stott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low frequency translational oscillation can provoke motion sickness in land vehicles, ships and aircraft. HYPOTHESIS: Nauseogenicity should decrease towards the higher frequencies.
METHODS: Some 12 subjects were exposed to horizontal sinusoidal motion (3.6 m.s-2 peak) at four different frequencies 0.35, 0.50, 0.70, and 1.00 Hz, at 1-week intervals, latin square order. Subjects were seated in the upright position; motion was through the head-body X-axis. Motion was stopped (motion endpoint) at moderate nausea or after 30 min.
RESULTS: The proportion of subjects experiencing moderate nausea decreased towards the higher frequency: 9/12 at 0.35 Hz, 3/12 at 0.50 Hz, 0/12 at 0.70 Hz, and 2/12 at 1.00 Hz. The mean time to motion endpoint increased significantly (p < 0.001) towards the higher frequency: 17.4 min 0.35 Hz; 26.0 min 0.50 Hz; 30 min 0.70 Hz; 28.3 min 1.00 Hz. Differences between frequencies were significant (0.001 < p < 0.05) except for 0.70 Hz to 1.00 Hz. At all frequencies tested, horizontal stimuli were more nauseogenic than predicted by mathematical models based on the frequency and intensity of vertical oscillation. Somatogravic illusion (SGI) was reported by 9/12 subjects (mean illusory tilt angles 15.6 degrees forward, 14.1 degrees back). SGI tended to diminish at the higher frequencies, but there was no relationship between SGI and motion sickness.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm previous findings (9), and furthermore indicate that horizontal X-axis translational oscillation has greatly reduced nauseogenic potential at frequencies greater than 0.5 Hz. A mathematical model is proposed to predict motion sickness intensity and incidence due to this stimulus, which may also be applicable to equivalent Y-axis motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9143749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  5 in total

1.  Autonomic response to real versus illusory motion (vection).

Authors:  M Aoki; K V Thilo; P Burchill; J F Golding; M A Gresty
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Motion sickness on tilting trains.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Mingjia Dai; Dmitri Ogorodnikov; Jean Laurens; Theodore Raphan; Philippe Müller; Alexiou Athanasios; Jürgen Edmaier; Thomas Grossenbacher; Klaus Stadtmüller; Ueli Brugger; Gerald Hauser; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Motion sickness, body movement, and claustrophobia during passive restraint.

Authors:  Elise Faugloire; Cédrick T Bonnet; Michael A Riley; Benoît G Bardy; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Amplitude and Temporal Dynamics of Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Tugrul Irmak; Varun Kotian; Riender Happee; Ksander N de Winkel; Daan M Pool
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Individual motion perception parameters and motion sickness frequency sensitivity in fore-aft motion.

Authors:  Tugrul Irmak; Ksander N de Winkel; Daan M Pool; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Riender Happee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.