Literature DB >> 9143211

Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions.

R B Kaufmann1, L Morris, A M Spitz.   

Abstract

Unintended pregnancies can have serious health, social, and economic consequences. Such pregnancies may be unwanted (a baby is not wanted at any time) or mistimed, yet wanted (a baby is wanted eventually). Intended pregnancies are those conceived when desired. Reproductive health survey respondents' understanding of these concepts and validity of survey results may be affected by question order and wording. Using a randomized crossover design, National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) and Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) intendedness questions were asked in a 1993 survey of Arizona women aged 18-44 years. Of 2,352 ever-pregnant respondents, 25% gave discordant responses to DHS and NSFG questions about the most recent pregnancy. Age, marital status, household income, education, parity, time since pregnancy, and outcome of pregnancy were significantly predictive of discordant responses. DHS and NSFG questions yielded similar prevalence estimates of intendedness and wantedness; but young, unmarried respondents gave more "mistimed" responses on whichever question was asked later. Classifying pregnancies as intended, mistimed, or unwanted may be a problem for women who have not decided on lifetime reproductive preferences. Approaches to improving survey validity include addressing ambivalence, clarifying the definition of "unwanted," and, for young, unmarried women, not attempting to classify unintended pregnancies as mistimed or unwanted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Arizona; Comparative Studies; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Error Sources; Family And Household; Family Characteristics; Family Size; Family Size, Desired; Fertility; Fertility Preferences; Measurement; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9143211     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  32 in total

1.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

2.  Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different?

Authors:  M R Sable; M K Libbus
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

3.  Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal examination.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Maureen G Phipps; Nancy E Adler; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 4.  Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Taiba Balkhair; Arne Ohlsson; Joseph Beyene; Fran Scott; Corine Frick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

5.  Unintended pregnancy in a commercially insured population.

Authors:  Diane C Green; Julie A Gazmararian; Lisa D Mahoney; Nancy A Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

6.  Comparison of a Timing-Based Measure of Unintended Pregnancy and the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Carolyn L Westhoff; James Trussell; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-08-30

7.  Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy.

Authors:  G Barrett; S C Smith; K Wellings
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Gender Equity, Opportunity Costs of Parenthood, and Educational Differences in Unintended First Births: Insights from Japan.

Authors:  James M Raymo; Kelly Musick; Miho Iwasawa
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2015-04-01

9.  Domestic violence, contraceptive use, and unwanted pregnancy in rural India.

Authors:  Rob Stephenson; Michael A Koenig; Rajib Acharya; Tarun K Roy
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2008-09

10.  High rate of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in a maternity hospital in Córdoba, Argentina: a pilot study.

Authors:  Celina Palena; M Valeria Bahamondes; Verónica Schenk; Luis Bahamondes; Julio Fernandez-Funes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.