Literature DB >> 9142516

Cutaneous nasal malignancies: is primary reconstruction safe?

G R Evans1, J Z Williams, N B Ainslie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nose is particularly vulnerable to cutaneous malignancies, making it the most common location for presentation. Recurrence of these cutaneous lesions is not uncommon, often compromising the timing of nasal restoration. It is the purpose of this report to reexamine the safety of primary nasal reconstruction in selected patients.
METHODS: Seventy-one patients who underwent nasal reconstruction at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1987 and 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 35 men and 36 women with an average age of 60 years. All nasal reconstructions were performed for defects secondary to malignancies. Basal cell carcinoma was the most common lesion (n = 49), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n = 10) and melanoma (n = 7), with five additional variable malignancies. The most common location of the cutaneous lesions was the nasal dorsum, and the forehead flap was the most common adjacent tissue used for reconstruction. Immediate reconstruction was performed for 42 of the basal cell carcinomas, 6 of the squamous cell carcinomas, 6 melanomas, and 3 other lesions. Delayed restoration was performed for 7 basal cell carcinomas, 4 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 melanoma, and 2 additional lesions. The average time between surgical extirpation and the start of nasal reconstruction was 8.2 months for basal cell carcinoma, 29 months for squamous cell carcinoma, and 10 months for melanoma.
RESULTS: Twenty-six recurrent lesions were identified at an average of 36 months after extirpation. Despite these numbers, only three recurred after nasal reconstruction at our institution. Follow-up averaged 41 months, with none less than 1 year. Seventy patients are still alive with no evidence of disease.
CONCLUSION: Primary reconstruction is safe in selected patients. Surgical delay in reconstruction should be considered if margins are questionable, the pathology is determined to be aggressive, if there is perineural or deep bony invasion, or if postoperative radiotherapy is to be initiated. Nasal reconstruction ultimately is based upon a complex series of issues but can be performed with few complications in an effort to restore self-image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142516     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199705)19:3<182::aid-hed3>3.0.co;2-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  4 in total

1.  Overview of nasal soft tissue reconstruction: keeping it simple.

Authors:  William M Weathers; John C Koshy; Erik M Wolfswinkel; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Reconstruction of small soft tissue nasal defects.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; David Cheng; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.

Authors:  Jin Kyung Chae; Jeong Hee Kim; Eun Jung Kim; Kun Park
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 4.  The Evolution of Care of Cancers of the Head and Neck Region: State of the Science in 2020.

Authors:  Flora Yan; Hannah M Knochelmann; Patrick F Morgan; John M Kaczmar; David M Neskey; Evan M Graboyes; Shaun A Nguyen; Besim Ogretmen; Anand K Sharma; Terry A Day
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.