Literature DB >> 9142514

Detailed quality of life assessment in patients treated with primary radiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the base of the tongue.

L B Harrison1, M J Zelefsky, D G Pfister, E Carper, A Raben, D H Kraus, E W Strong, A Rao, H Thaler, T Polyak, R Portenoy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate quality of life in patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT) for cancer of the base of tongue.
METHODS: From 1981 to 1990, 36 patients with primary squamous cell cancer of the base of tongue were managed with primary radiotherapy. Ages ranged from 35 to 71 years (median, 58 years), T Stage was: T1, n = 11; T2, n = 14; T3, n = 10; T4, n = 1. Thirty-one patients (86%) had palpable cervical lymph node metastases at initial examination (N1, n = 16; N2, n = 11; N3, n = 4). Patients received external beam RT to their primary site and necks, followed by a brachytherapy boost to the tongue. Those with neck nodes also had a neck dissection. The median follow-up is 5 years (minimum, 3 years). Actuarial 5-year local control was 85%; regional control was 96%; distant metastases-free survival was 87.5%; and overall survival, 85%. Twenty-nine of the 30 long-term survivors completed (1) Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), (2) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), (3) Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS), and (4) a sociodemographic and economic questionnaire. At the time of cancer diagnosis, 62% were employed full-time, and 21% were employed part-time; 83% were earning > $20,000/year, and 59% were earning > $60,000/year.
RESULTS: At follow-up, annual incomes were similar to those at initial examination. Of those who had been working full-time, 72% were still in full-time work, and of those who had been working part-time, 83% were still in part-time work. Average PSS scores were 90 for eating in public, 96 for understandability of speech, and 68 for normalcy of diet. On the MSAS, the following symptoms had prevalence: > 30% xerostomia, difficulty swallowing, decreased energy, pain, worrying, insomnia, cough, drowsy, change in taste, and irritability. Scores on the FACT exceeded published values collected for a mixed cancer population.
CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of patients achieved excellent functional status and quality of life and could maintain their prediagnosis earning potential and employment status after primary radiation for advanced base of tongue cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142514     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199705)19:3<169::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  29 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: oral cancer.

Authors:  J M Zakrzewska
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-17

2.  Feasibility and Acceptance of a Telehealth Intervention to Promote Symptom Management during Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Barbara A Head; Cynthia Keeney; Jamie L Studts; Mamdouh Khayat; Jeffrey Bumpous; Mark Pfeifer
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 3.  Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  O Ballivy; R Galiana Santamaría; A Lozano Borbalas; F Guedea Edo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Long-term workforce participation patterns following head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Alison Pearce; Aileen Timmons; Eleanor O'Sullivan; Pamela Gallagher; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Audrey Alforque Thomas; Michal Molcho; Phyllis Butow; Linda Sharp
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Long-term functional outcomes and patient perspective following altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost for oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Bena Cartmill; Petrea Cornwell; Elizabeth Ward; Wendy Davidson; Sandro Porceddu
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Head and neck cancer pain: systematic review of prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Tanja Wirth; Sriyani Ranasinghe; Kim W Ah-See; Nick Renny; David Hurman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-04-01

7.  Evaluation of parotid gland function following intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Seok Ho Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Joo Young Kim; Sung Yong Park; Hong Ryull Pyo; Kyung Hwan Shin; Dae Yong Kim; Joo Young Kim; Kwan Ho Cho
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 8.  Quality of life of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with brachytherapy.

Authors:  David N Teguh; Peter C Levendag; Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo; Peter van Rooij; Paul I M Schmitz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Salivary gland sparing and improved target irradiation by conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan A Ship; Laura A Dawson; Hyungjin M Kim; Carol R Bradford; Jeffrey E Terrell; Douglas B Chepeha; Theodore N Teknos; Norman D Hogikyan; Yoshimi Anzai; Lon H Marsh; Randall K Ten Haken; Gregory T Wolf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Parotid gland sparing IMRT for head and neck cancer improves xerostomia related quality of life.

Authors:  C M van Rij; W D Oughlane-Heemsbergen; A H Ackerstaff; E A Lamers; A J M Balm; C R N Rasch
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.