OBJECTIVE: In the context of the need to develop practical outcome measures, the present study aimed to assess the sensitivity of the Life Skills Profile (LSP) in terms of differences between hospital-based and community-based clients, and to assess the sensitivity of the LSP to changes over time. In this way, criteria could be established whereby the LSP could be used to determine appropriate changes in locus of care, both in terms of the "cut-off' for hospital-based and community-based tenure, and the level of "clinically significant change' in functioning. METHOD: The LSP was administered at 3-monthly intervals to 200 clients of an area public mental health service with serious mental illness over a 21-month period. Locus of care (hospital or community) was noted at each administration. RESULTS: Clients in the community scored significantly better than those in hospital, however there was a great deal of overlap. Using hospital or community tenure as the variable of interest, a measure of reliable and clinically significant change over a 3-month period based on the LSP was developed. A total LSP score of 116.5 or above best discriminated clients in the community from those in hospital, and a difference of 18 points or more in two LSP obtained 3 months apart was unlikely to have arisen by chance. A simple, two-part criterion of significant change based on these results showed 89% accuracy in matching transition (or lack of transition) between hospital and community with changes in LSP scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results need to be understood within the methodological limitations of the present study. The findings provide users of the LSP with guidelines for the interpretation of repeat assessments. This may encourage more services to use formal reassessment methods to monitor the progress of their clients.
OBJECTIVE: In the context of the need to develop practical outcome measures, the present study aimed to assess the sensitivity of the Life Skills Profile (LSP) in terms of differences between hospital-based and community-based clients, and to assess the sensitivity of the LSP to changes over time. In this way, criteria could be established whereby the LSP could be used to determine appropriate changes in locus of care, both in terms of the "cut-off' for hospital-based and community-based tenure, and the level of "clinically significant change' in functioning. METHOD: The LSP was administered at 3-monthly intervals to 200 clients of an area public mental health service with serious mental illness over a 21-month period. Locus of care (hospital or community) was noted at each administration. RESULTS: Clients in the community scored significantly better than those in hospital, however there was a great deal of overlap. Using hospital or community tenure as the variable of interest, a measure of reliable and clinically significant change over a 3-month period based on the LSP was developed. A total LSP score of 116.5 or above best discriminated clients in the community from those in hospital, and a difference of 18 points or more in two LSP obtained 3 months apart was unlikely to have arisen by chance. A simple, two-part criterion of significant change based on these results showed 89% accuracy in matching transition (or lack of transition) between hospital and community with changes in LSP scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results need to be understood within the methodological limitations of the present study. The findings provide users of the LSP with guidelines for the interpretation of repeat assessments. This may encourage more services to use formal reassessment methods to monitor the progress of their clients.