Literature DB >> 9140427

Effect of screening in the Nordic cancer control up to the year 2017.

M Hakama1, L Hristova.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of screening for cancer on mortality, quality of life and cost in the Nordic countries up to 2017. Data from the Nordic Cancer Registries were used to predict, by means of the age-period cohort models, cancer mortality assuming no screening, the screening actually practised and most effective screening observed. Cost of screening was assessed assuming the cost of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening per person as well as treatment, follow-up and terminal care by stage. The results were adjusted for quality of life directly associated with screening and indirectly induced as dementia by the prolongation of life. Ultimately, in the year 2017 screening will prevent about 4000 deaths in the Nordic countries, most (91%) cervical cancer and a smaller proportion of breast cancer (18%) and colorectal cancer (18%) deaths are preventable. This is equal to 5.7% among all potential cancer deaths in 2017, which corresponds to about one life year gained due to all cancer screening per 1000 years lived by the Nordic population in 2017. Adjustment for quality of life may at most reduce the benefit by about 20%. The cost of screening for breast cancer is expensive, that for cervical cancer is likely to be cost saving, and cost of screening for colorectal cancer may occupy an intermediate position. It is concluded that about 6% of the cancer deaths in the Nordic countries can be prevented by screening. This figure is fully realistic given the Nordic type of organized screening programmes, whereas many other predictions affecting cancer burden are more speculative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9140427     DOI: 10.3109/02841869709109219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of 'see-see and treat' strategy and role of HIV on cervical cancer prevention in Uganda.

Authors:  Twaha Mutyaba; Florence Mirembe; Sven Sandin; Elisabete Weiderpass
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with primary human papillomavirus testing in Norway.

Authors:  E A Burger; J D Ortendahl; S Sy; I S Kristiansen; J J Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Estimating the cost of cervical cancer screening in five developing countries.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2006-08-03

4.  Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography; a systematic review.

Authors:  Arash Rashidian; Eshagh Barfar; Hamed Hosseini; Shirin Nosratnejad; Esmat Barooti
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence.

Authors:  S Vaccarella; S Franceschi; G Engholm; S Lönnberg; S Khan; F Bray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.