Literature DB >> 9139177

Metabolic efficiency during arm and leg exercise at the same relative intensities.

J Kang1, R J Robertson, F L Goss, S G Dasilva, R R Suminski, A C Utter, R F Zoeller, K F Metz.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare gross efficiency (GE), net efficiency (NE), work efficiency (WE), and delta efficiency (DE) between arm crank and cycle exercise at the same relative intensities. Eight college-aged males underwent two experimental trials presented in a randomized counterbalanced order. During each trial subjects performed three intermittent 7-min exercise bouts separated by 10-min rest intervals on an arm or semirecumbent leg ergometer. The power outputs for the three bouts of arm crank or cycle exercise corresponded to 50, 60, and 70% of the mode-specific VO2peak. GE, NE, and WE were determined as the ratio of Kcal.min-1 equivalent of power output to Kcal.min-1 of total energy expended, energy expended above rest and energy expended above unloaded exercise, respectively. DE was determined as the ratio of the increment of Kcal.min-1 of power output above the previous lower intensity to the increment of kcal.min-1 of total energy expended above the previous lower intensity. GE and NE did not differ between arm crank and cycle exercises. However, WE was lower (P < 0.05) during arm crank than cycle exercise at 50, 60, and 70% VO2peak. DE was also lower (P < 0.05) during arm crank than cycle exercise at delta 50-60 and at delta 60-70% VO2peak. It is concluded metabolic efficiency as determined by work and delta efficiency indices was lower during arm crank compared with cycle exercise at the same relative intensities. These findings add to the understanding of the difference in metabolic efficiency between upper and lower body exercise.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9139177     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199703000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  18 in total

1.  Regulating intensity using perceived exertion during extended exercise periods.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Jay R Hoffman; Heather Walker; Edward C Chaloupka; Alan C Utter
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Supra-maximal cycling efficiency assessed in humans by using a new protocol.

Authors:  Laurent Mourot; Frédérique Hintzy; Laurent Messonier; Karim Zameziati; Alain Belli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physiological aspects of surfboard riding performance.

Authors:  Alberto Mendez-Villanueva; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Validation of an equation for predicting energy cost of arm ergometry in women.

Authors:  Swapan Mookerjee; Cynthia Surmacz; Margaret Till; Brandy Weller
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effect of preceding resistance exercise on metabolism during subsequent aerobic session.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Stefanie L Rashti; Christopher P Tranchina; Nicholas A Ratamess; Avery D Faigenbaum; Jay R Hoffman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Regulating intensity using perceived exertion: effect of exercise duration.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Edward C Chaloupka; Gregory B Biren; M Alysia Mastrangelo; Jay R Hoffman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Physiological and lipid profile response to acute exercise at different intensities in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Eduardo S Alves; Ronaldo Vt Santos; Francieli S Ruiz; Fabio S Lira; Alexandre A Almeida; Giscard Lima; Thatiana Cs Goni; Lila Oyama; Kate M Edwards; Sergio Tufik; Marco Túlio De Mello
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 8.  Effects of resistance training on older adults.

Authors:  Gary R Hunter; John P McCarthy; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Metabolic responses to whole-body vibration: effect of frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Tara Porfido; Craig Ismaili; Soraya Selamie; Jermey Kuper; Jill A Bush; Nicholas A Ratamess; Avery D Faigenbaum
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effect of contraction frequency on energy expenditure and substrate utilisation during upper and lower body exercise.

Authors:  J Kang; J R Hoffman; M Wendell; H Walker; M Hebert
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.