Literature DB >> 9138552

Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap.

W H Guilford1, D E Dupuis, G Kennedy, J Wu, J B Patlak, D M Warshaw.   

Abstract

Purified smooth muscle myosin in the in vitro motility assay propels actin filaments at 1/10 the velocity, yet produces 3-4 times more force than skeletal muscle myosin. At the level of a single myosin molecule, these differences in force and actin filament velocity may be reflected in the size and duration of single motion and force-generating events, or in the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle. Specifically, an increase in either unitary force or duty cycle may explain the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth muscle myosin. Similarly, an increase in attached time or decrease in unitary displacement may explain the reduced actin filament velocity of smooth muscle myosin. To discriminate between these possibilities, we used a laser trap to measure unitary forces and displacements from single smooth and skeletal muscle myosin molecules. We analyzed our data using mean-variance analysis, which does not rely on scoring individual events by eye, and emphasizes periods in the data with constant properties. Both myosins demonstrated multiple but similar event populations with discrete peaks at approximately +11 and -11 nm in displacement, and 1.5 and 3.5 pN in force. Mean attached times for smooth muscle myosin were longer than for skeletal-muscle myosin. These results explain much of the difference in actin filament velocity between these myosins, and suggest that an increased duty cycle is responsible for the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth over skeletal-muscle myosin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9138552      PMCID: PMC1184489          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78753-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  41 in total

1.  Muscle structure and theories of contraction.

Authors:  A F HUXLEY
Journal:  Prog Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1957

2.  Characterization of a mammalian smooth muscle myosin heavy-chain gene: complete nucleotide and protein coding sequence and analysis of the 5' end of the gene.

Authors:  P Babij; C Kelly; M Periasamy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measuring kinetics of complex single ion channel data using mean-variance histograms.

Authors:  J B Patlak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Sliding filaments and molecular motile systems.

Authors:  H E Huxley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Smooth and skeletal muscle actin are mechanically indistinguishable in the in vitro motility assay.

Authors:  D E Harris; D M Warshaw
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro.

Authors:  D E Harris; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Identification of a novel smooth muscle myosin heavy chain cDNA: isoform diversity in the S1 head region.

Authors:  S White; A F Martin; M Periasamy
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-05

8.  Cross-bridge scheme and force per cross-bridge state in skinned rabbit psoas muscle fibers.

Authors:  M Kawai; Y Zhao
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor.

Authors:  I Rayment; W R Rypniewski; K Schmidt-Bäse; R Smith; D R Tomchick; M M Benning; D A Winkelmann; G Wesenberg; H M Holden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Lys-65 and Glu-168 are the residues for carbodiimide-catalyzed cross-linking between the two heads of rigor smooth muscle heavy meromyosin.

Authors:  H Onishi; T Maita; G Matsuda; K Fujiwara
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  98 in total

1.  Kinetic differences at the single molecule level account for the functional diversity of rabbit cardiac myosin isoforms.

Authors:  K A Palmiter; M J Tyska; D E Dupuis; N R Alpert; D M Warshaw
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Detection of fluorescently labeled actin-bound cross-bridges in actively contracting myofibrils.

Authors:  W C Cooper; L R Chrin; C L Berger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Cooperativity of myosin molecules through strain-dependent chemistry.

Authors:  T Duke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Single-motor mechanics and models of the myosin motor.

Authors:  T Yanagida; S Esaki; A H Iwane; Y Inoue; A Ishijima; K Kitamura; H Tanaka; M Tokunaga
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Thin-filament linked regulation of smooth muscle myosin.

Authors:  J R Haeberle
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Tropomyosin directly modulates actomyosin mechanical performance at the level of a single actin filament.

Authors:  P VanBuren; K A Palmiter; D M Warshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Unphosphorylated crossbridges and latch: smooth muscle regulation revisited.

Authors:  J R Sellers
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Molecular model of muscle contraction.

Authors:  T A Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Two heads of myosin are better than one for generating force and motion.

Authors:  M J Tyska; D E Dupuis; W H Guilford; J B Patlak; G S Waller; K M Trybus; D M Warshaw; S Lowey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A thermodynamic muscle model and a chemical basis for A.V. Hill's muscle equation.

Authors:  J E Baker; D D Thomas
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.