Literature DB >> 9138067

Friction properties at the bone-metal interface: comparison of four different porous metal surfaces.

M Dammak1, A Shirazi-Adl, M Schwartz, L Gustavson.   

Abstract

Detailed friction load-displacement response of four distinct metallic surfaces [one beaded porous metal (CTR) and three cast Co-Cr alloy ingrowth mesh surfaces, nonplanar mesh (INX), cast mesh 1 (CM1), and cast mesh 2 (CM2)] on poly-urethane and cancellous bone specimens of six tibiae were measured under different normal stresses (0.1, 0.15, or 0.025 MPa). Bone cubes were obtained from different proximal regions of resurfaced cadaveric tibiae. Both monotonic and cyclic fatigue loadings of up to 4000 cycles at 1 Hz were considered. Comparison of measured results indicated that the friction coefficient was not affected by the magnitude of normal stress and the bone excision site (medial, lateral, anterior, posterior, and central). The CM2 surface showed significantly greater resistance with friction coefficients of more than 0.9 for the bone and 0.8 for the polyurethane. The INX surface yielded the second largest resistance followed by CM1 and CTR surfaces. NO significant difference was found between these latter two surfaces. Fatigue tests of up to 4000 loading-unloading cycles showed about 10% reduction in friction coefficient for CTR and INX surfaces, while negligible reduction was found for CM1 and CM2 surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9138067     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19970605)35:3<329::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A hierarchy of computationally derived surgical and patient influences on metal on metal press-fit acetabular cup failure.

Authors:  S G Clarke; A T M Phillips; A M J Bull; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Brett D Steineman; Daniel R Sturnick; Jonathan T Deland; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Frictional and bone ingrowth properties of engineered surface topographies produced by electron beam technology.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Biemond; René Aquarius; Nico Verdonschot; Pieter Buma
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Effects of Increased Retroversion Angle on Glenoid Baseplate Fixation in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Friedman; Shuchun Sun; Xin She; Jordan Esposito; Josef Eichinger; Hai Yao
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-01-02

6.  Assessment of the primary rotational stability of uncemented hip stems using an analytical model: comparison with finite element analyses.

Authors:  Maria E Zeman; Nicolas Sauwen; Luc Labey; Michiel Mulier; Georges Van der Perre; Siegfried V N Jaecques
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Release of titanium after insertion of dental implants with different surface characteristics - an ex vivo animal study.

Authors:  Mattias Pettersson; Jean Pettersson; Margareta Molin Thorén; Anders Johansson
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-11-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.