Literature DB >> 9137180

Computer assisted spine surgery.

P Merloz1, J Tonetti, A Eid, C Faure, S Lavallee, J Troccaz, P Sautot, A Hamadeh, P Cinquin.   

Abstract

When inserting screws into a vertebral pedicle, the surgeon usually exposes the back part of the vertebra and uses his or her anatomic knowledge to align the drill in the proper direction. A slight error in direction may result in an important error in the position of the tip of the screw. This is done with no direct visibility of crucial structures (spinal cord, pleura, vessels). Statistical analysis of a series of surgical procedures has shown that 10% to 40% of the screws are not installed correctly. To reduce the risk of complication, a computer assisted method is proposed that enables the surgeon to place a screw at a position preoperatively defined in 3 dimensions using computed tomography images. This allows the surgeon to align a standard surgical drill with the optimal position and direction. The depth of the pilot hole during drilling also is monitored by the system to prevent penetration of the anterior cortex of the vertebral body. Using this procedure, in vitro tests were performed and showed that an accuracy of less than 1 mm can be obtained. Clinical trials were done in 10 patients who suffered severe scoliosis or spondylolisthesis. The trajectory of the holes drilled in L2, L3, L4, and L5 vertebrae were checked for all clinical tests. Postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans showed that the screws were well inserted in each plane for each pedicle. This technique also can be used to perform osteosynthesis at the thoracic and cervical levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9137180     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199704000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Registration and geometric modelling of the spine during scoliosis surgery: a comparison study of different pre-operative reconstruction techniques and intra-operative tracking systems.

Authors:  J M Mac-Thiong; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; J A de Guise; P Brodeur; H Labelle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Assessment of CAOS as a training model in spinal surgery: a randomised study.

Authors:  P J Richards; I C Kurta; V Jasani; C H Wynn Jones; A Rahmatalla; G Mackenzie; J Dove
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [The history and development of computer assisted orthopaedic surgery].

Authors:  J-Y Jenny
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Computer-assisted Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  David Hernandez; Roja Garimella; Adam E M Eltorai; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery.

Authors:  Yuichi Tamura; Nobuhiko Sugano; Toshihiko Sasama; Yoshinobu Sato; Shinichi Tamura; Kazuo Yonenobu; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takahiro Ochi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Navigated pedicle screw placement using computed tomographic data in dorsolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Saurabh Kapoor; Rajbahadur Sharma; Sudhir Garg; Rohit Jindal; Ravi Gupta; Anshul Goe
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  A medium invasiveness multi-level patient's specific template for pedicle screw placement in the scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Farhad Azimifar; Kamran Hassani; Amir Hossein Saveh; Farhad Tabatabai Ghomsheh
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.