Literature DB >> 9136273

Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli.

S Brown1, M E Nicholls.   

Abstract

This study investigates a left-hemisphere (LH) advantage for the discrimination of fine temporal events within the auditory modality in 24 normal adults. Brief noise bursts were delivered monaurally to the left or right ears, half of which contained a gap lasting between 2 and 8 msec. Subjects were required to indicate whether or not the noise burst contained a gap. Research within this area has yielded conflicting results. It is possible that variations in gap position or the properties of the noise burst may have contributed to this conflict. The effect of gap position was investigated by systematically varying the position of the gap during half of the trials. White noise bursts were used to avoid the use of spectral cues. Reaction time, response bias, and response error measures revealed a right-ear (and hence LH) advantage for gap detection. Stable gap positions were recognized more accurately than variable gap positions. Gap position had no effect on the observed LH advantage. These results suggest that the auditory properties of noise burst, rather than gap position, play an important role in the discrepancies observed in this area.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9136273     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  Effect of lateralized gaps in noise on the cutaneous blink reflex in humans.

Authors:  G Hammond
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Laterality of basic auditory perception.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Anjali Bhatara
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  NLGC: Network localized Granger causality with application to MEG directional functional connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Behrad Soleimani; Proloy Das; I M Dushyanthi Karunathilake; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jonathan Z Simon; Behtash Babadi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.400

5.  Processing of complex auditory patterns in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Bastiaan Boh; Sibylle C Herholz; Claudia Lappe; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Changes in the response properties of inferior colliculus neurons relating to tinnitus.

Authors:  Joel I Berger; Ben Coomber; Tobias T Wells; Mark N Wallace; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Central auditory processing and word discrimination in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ayub Valadbeigi; Farzad Weisi; Nematolah Rohbakhsh; Mohammad Rezaei; Atta Heidari; Amir Rahmani Rasa
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Predicting speech discrimination scores from pure-tone thresholds-A machine learning-based approach using data from 12,697 subjects.

Authors:  Hantai Kim; JaeYeon Park; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jeong Hun Jang; JeongGil Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sound localization in patients with a unilateral hearing aid: Discordance between the right and left ears.

Authors:  Jungho Ha; Hantai Kim; Ju Ho Lee; Hun Yi Park
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04

10.  Right Hemispheric Contributions to Fine Auditory Temporal Discriminations: High-Density Electrical Mapping of the Duration Mismatch Negativity (MMN).

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Sophie Molholm; Marina Shpaner; Walter Ritter; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.