Literature DB >> 9135867

Constant affine velocity predicts the 1/3 power law of planar motion perception and generation.

F E Pollick1, G Sapiro.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that the power of 1/3 is important in relating Euclidean velocity to radius of curvature (R) in the generation and perception of planar movement. Although the relation between velocity and curvature is clear and very intuitive, no valid explanation for the specific 1/3 value has yet been found. We show that if instead of computing the Euclidean velocity we compute the affine one, a velocity which is invariant to affine transformations, then we obtain that the unique function of R which will give (constant) affine invariant velocity is precisely R1/3. This means that the 1/3 power law, experimentally found in the studies of hand-drawing and planar motion perception, implies motion at constant affine velocity. Since drawing/perceiving at constant affine velocity implies that curves of equal affine length will be drawn in equal time, we performed an experiment to further support this result. Results showed agreement between the 1/3 power law and drawing at constant affine velocity. Possible reasons for the appearance of affine transformations in the generation and perception of planar movement are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9135867     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00116-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Spectrum of power laws for curved hand movements.

Authors:  Dongsung Huh; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Timing of continuous motor imagery: the two-thirds power law originates in trajectory planning.

Authors:  Matan Karklinsky; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Default Mode Network Differentiates Biological From Non-Biological Motion.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Irit Sella; Albert Mukovskiy; Yehonatan Douek; Martin A Giese; Rafael Malach; Tamar Flash
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  The power law as behavioral illusion: reappraising the reappraisals.

Authors:  Richard S Marken; Dennis M Shaffer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The speed-curvature power law of movements: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Adam Matic; Tamar Flash; Alex Gomez-Marin; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the similarities between the perception and production of elliptical trajectories.

Authors:  Nava Levit-Binnun; Edna Schechtman; Tamar Flash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Comparing smooth arm movements with the two-thirds power law and the related segmented-control hypothesis.

Authors:  Magnus J E Richardson; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Affine differential geometry analysis of human arm movements.

Authors:  Tamar Flash; Amir A Handzel
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Movement timing and invariance arise from several geometries.

Authors:  Daniel Bennequin; Ronit Fuchs; Alain Berthoz; Tamar Flash
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: evidence for action-perception coupling.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Antonino Casile; Nava Levit-Binnun; Martin A Giese; Talma Hendler; Tamar Flash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.