Literature DB >> 9135854

Lung auscultation in airway challenge testing.

A Purohit1, A Bohadana, M C Kopferschmitt-Kubler, L Mahr, J Linder, G Pauli.   

Abstract

The appearance of wheezes and changes in inspiratory breath (vesicular) sound intensity (BSI) were monitored in patients undergoing routine methacholine challenge test (MCT). The results were compared with changes in spirometry and to airway hyper-responsiveness (AH). Fifty-four patients were examined. Spirometry was performed before and after the inhalation of cumulative doses of methacholine starting from 25 micrograms; a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) by 20% or more was considered as significant. Lung auscultation was performed by two observers simultaneously using a special stethoscope placed sequentially over the posterior right and left upper (interscapular region, 5 cm from the fourth thoracic vertebra) and lower lung zones (5 cm below the scapulae). Symptoms were recorded by the patients on a visual analogue scale. In 27 patients, the MCT was positive (MCT+) and in 27 patients it was negative (MCT-). Wheezes were identified at PD20 in 12 MCT+ patients while reduced BSI alone was found in 11 patients; in four patients, auscultation was normal. In 20 MCT+ patients, either wheezes, diminished BSI or both were heard, one to several steps before reaching PD20. In the MCT- group, wheezes were detected in two patients and diminished BSI in four. In MCT+ patients, the mean (+/-SD) perception of symptoms at end-challenge was 33% (+/-26), whereas in MCT- patients, it was 13.6% (+/-22). Complete inter-observer agreement was found in 95.7% of auscultations performed (Kappa coefficient = 0.846). Coupled to spirometry, lung auscultation may prove useful in airway challenge testing provided the concept is accepted that wheeze appearance and, by extension, an acute decrease in BSI, is as legitimate a manifestation of AH as a fall in FEV1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9135854     DOI: 10.1016/s0954-6111(97)90051-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  2 in total

Review 1.  Narrative review: should teaching of the respiratory physical examination be restricted only to signs with proven reliability and validity?

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat; Reuben Baumal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Perception of wheezing in the elderly asthmatics.

Authors:  J H Joo; G I Lim; M J Seo; S J Park; J H Lee; S T Uh; Y H Kim; C S Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.884

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.