Literature DB >> 9135813

Amount of defocus is not used as an error signal in the control system of accommodation dynamics.

T Yamada1, K Ukai.   

Abstract

Usually defocus is considered as the error signal in the negative feedback system of accommodation control. However it is difficult to estimate the amount of defocus from the contrast reduction of a retinal image because both defocus and the spatial structure of the target determine the contrast. To investigate whether the accommodation control system can perceive the amount of error signal (defocus) from the contrast reduction of a retinal image, step responses for various amplitudes of stimuli were measured. The traces were analysed using an exponential curve fitting method in which not only time constant, but also final value of the curve, could be estimated from a portion of the exponential curve. The near-to-far (or -intermediate) step responses have a common path and show that the curve initially goes towards a certain position around the dark focus of the subject and is suddenly clipped around the correct focus position. The time constant and the destination of the curve are independent from the stimulus step amplitude (amount of error). This fact suggests that the accommodative control system does not refer to the amount of error signal when error is large, and that the system monitors only whether retinal blur exists or not. When the system judges the retinal image to be no longer blurred during the preprogrammed fast movement, accommodative response is stopped suddenly and the control is transferred to the other mechanism to hold correct focusing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9135813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  7 in total

1.  Dynamics of the near response under natural viewing conditions with an open-view sensor.

Authors:  Emmanuel Chirre; Pedro Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Binocular dynamics of accommodation, convergence, and pupil size in myopes.

Authors:  Vahid Pourreza Ghoushchi; Juan Mompeán; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Accommodation and vergence latencies in human infants.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Effect of temporal location of correction of monochromatic aberrations on the dynamic accommodation response.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Sem Sem Chin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.