Literature DB >> 9134736

Evolution of forelimb movement patterns for prey manipulation in anurans.

L A Gray1, J C O'Reilly, K C Nishikawa.   

Abstract

Unlike other amphibians, frogs often use their forelimbs to capture and transport prey. In the present study, high-speed videography was used to observe forelimb use during feeding in a diverse group of anurans in order to determine the evolution of forelimb movement patterns among anuran taxa. Data were gathered from 488 individuals representing 104 species, 55 genera, and 16 families. Five distinct behavior patterns were identified: scooping entails using the back of the hand to push prey into the mouth; wiping involves the use of the palm of the hand to push prey, protruding laterally from the mouth, toward the midline; during prey stretching, one end of the prey is held in a stationary position by the hands while the other end is pulled upward by the jaws; in grasping, the palms face the midline or the substrate as the fingers are wrapped around the prey; grasping with wrist rotation is similar to grasping, but the wrists rotate inward as the hands grasp the prey so that the palms face the mouth. The distribution of these behavior patterns was mapped onto the most recent phylogenetic hypothesis for anurans. Maximum parsimony analyses suggest that scooping and wiping are primitive and have been retained by many frog lineages. Wiping was not observed in the pipids, which are the only anurans that lack tongues and use hydraulic transport. Prey stretching appears to have evolved several times in unrelated taxa. Grasping and grasping with wrist rotation appear to have evolved only in arboreal groups, suggesting that the ability to climb is a preadaptation for the ability to grasp prey. Several species were observed using grasping motions in place of the tongue to capture prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9134736     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19970415)277:6<417::aid-jez1>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool        ISSN: 0022-104X


  7 in total

1.  Morphology and function of the forelimb in arboreal frogs: specializations for grasping ability?

Authors:  Adriana S Manzano; Virginia Abdala; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.

Authors:  Carrie A Carreño; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Digital dissection of the head of the frogs Calyptocephalella gayi and Leptodactylus pentadactylus with emphasis on the feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Stephanie Kunisch; Valentin Blüml; Thomas Schwaha; Christian Josef Beisser; Stephan Handschuh; Patrick Lemell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Quantifying anuran microhabitat use to infer the potential for parasite transmission between invasive cane toads and two species of Australian native frogs.

Authors:  Lígia Pizzatto; Camila Both; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bone indicators of grasping hands in lizards.

Authors:  Gabriela Fontanarrosa; Virginia Abdala
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Unveiling the roles of interspecific competition and local adaptation in phenotypic differentiation of parapatric frogs.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Xiaoyi Wang; Xin Yang; Jianping Jiang; Junhua Hu
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Genomic adaptations for arboreal locomotion in Asian flying treefrogs.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Yue-Dong Gao; De-Chun Jiang; Juan Lei; Jin-Long Ren; Wen-Bo Liao; Cao Deng; Zeng Wang; David M Hillis; Ya-Ping Zhang; Jia-Tang Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 12.779

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.