Literature DB >> 9134243

Drinking water chlorination and cancer-a historical cohort study in Finland.

M Koivusalo1, E Pukkala, T Vartiainen, J J Jaakkola, T Hakulinen.   

Abstract

Chlorination of water rich in organic material is known to produce a complex mixture of organochlorine compounds, including mutagenic and carcinogenic substances. A historical cohort study of 621,431 persons living in 56 towns in Finland was conducted in order to assess the relation between historical exposure to drinking water mutagenicity and cancer. Exposure to quantity of mutagenicity was calculated on the basis of historical information of raw water quality and water treatment practices using an empirical equation relating mutagenicity and raw water pH, KMnO4 value and chlorine dose. Cancer cases were derived from the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry and follow-up time in the study started in 1970. Age, gender, time period, social class, and urban residence were taken into account in Poisson regression analysis of the observed numbers of cases using expected numbers of cases standardized for age and gender as a basis. Excess risks were calculated using a continuous variable for mutagenicity for 3,000 net rev/l exposure representing an average exposure in a town using chlorinated surface water. After adjustment for confounding, a statistically significant excess risk was observed for women in cancers of the bladder (relative risk [RR] = 1.48, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-2.18), rectum (RR = 1.38, CI = 1.03-1.85), esophagus (RR = 1.90, CI = 1.02-3.52), and breast (RR = 1.11, CI = 1.01-1.22). These results support the magnitude of excess risks for rectal and bladder cancers found in earlier epidemiologic studies on chlorination by-products and give additional information on exposure-response concerning the mutagenic compounds. Nevertheless, due to the public health importance of water chlorination, uncertainty related to the magnitude of observed risks, and the fact that excess risks were observed only for women, the results of the study should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9134243     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018420229802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  17 in total

1.  Effect of trihalomethane exposure on fetal development.

Authors:  J M Wright; J Schwartz; D W Dockery
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Monitoring hospital wastewaters for their probable genotoxicity and mutagenicity.

Authors:  Pratibha Sharma; N Mathur; A Singh; M Sogani; P Bhatnagar; R Atri; S Pareek
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Solution by dilution?--A review on the pollution status of the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Tilman Floehr; Hongxia Xiao; Björn Scholz-Starke; Lingling Wu; Junli Hou; Daqiang Yin; Xiaowei Zhang; Rong Ji; Xingzhong Yuan; Richard Ottermanns; Martina Roß-Nickoll; Andreas Schäffer; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Health care industries: potential generators of genotoxic waste.

Authors:  Pratibha Sharma; Manish Kumar; N Mathur; A Singh; P Bhatnagar; M Sogani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Environmental epidemiology: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  J Pekkanen; N Pearce
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  3-Chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX) and mutagenic activity in Massachusetts drinking water.

Authors:  J Michael Wright; Joel Schwartz; Terttu Vartiainen; Jorma Mäki-Paakkanen; Larisa Altshul; Joseph J Harrington; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Chlorination disinfection by-products and pancreatic cancer risk.

Authors:  Minh T Do; Nicholas J Birkett; Kenneth C Johnson; Daniel Krewski; Paul Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Assessing exposure in epidemiologic studies to disinfection by-products in drinking water: report from an international workshop.

Authors:  Tye E Arbuckle; Steve E Hrudey; Stuart W Krasner; Jay R Nuckols; Susan D Richardson; Philip Singer; Pauline Mendola; Linda Dodds; Clifford Weisel; David L Ashley; Kenneth L Froese; Rex A Pegram; Irvin R Schultz; John Reif; Annette M Bachand; Frank M Benoit; Michele Lynberg; Charles Poole; Kirsten Waller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  G A Boorman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Cancer risk near a polluted river in Finland.

Authors:  Pia K Verkasalo; Esa Kokki; Eero Pukkala; Terttu Vartiainen; Hannu Kiviranta; Antti Penttinen; Juha Pekkanen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.