Literature DB >> 9133671

Transfected muscle and non-muscle actins are differentially sorted by cultured smooth muscle and non-muscle cells.

N Mounier1, J C Perriard, G Gabbiani, C Chaponnier.   

Abstract

We have analyzed by immunolabeling the fate of exogenous epitope-tagged actin isoforms introduced into cultured smooth muscle and non-muscle (i.e. endothelial and epithelial) cells by transfecting the corresponding cDNAs in transient expression assays. Exogenous muscle actins did not produce obvious shape changes in transfected cells. In smooth muscle cells, transfected striated and smooth muscle actins were preferentially recruited into stress fibers. In non-muscle cells, exogenous striated muscle actins were rarely incorporated into stress fibers but remained scattered within the cytoplasm and frequently appeared organized in long crystal-like inclusions. Transfected smooth muscle actins were incorporated into stress fibers of epithelial cells but not of endothelial cells. Exogenous non-muscle actins induced alterations of cell architecture and shape. All cell types transfected by non-muscle actin cDNAs showed an irregular shape and a poorly developed network of stress fibers. beta- and gamma-cytoplasmic actins transfected into muscle and non-muscle cells were dispersed throughout the cytoplasm, often accumulated at the cell periphery and rarely incorporated into stress fibers. These results show that isoactins are differently sorted: not only muscle and non-muscle actins are differentially distributed within the cell but also, according to the cell type, striated and smooth muscle actins can be discriminated for. Our observations support the assumption of isoactin functional diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9133671     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.110.7.839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  15 in total

Review 1.  Actin cytoskeleton and small heat shock proteins: how do they interact?

Authors:  Nicole Mounier; André-Patrick Arrigo
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses.

Authors:  Adam Engler; Lucie Bacakova; Cynthia Newman; Alina Hategan; Maureen Griffin; Dennis Discher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Specific features of neuronal size and shape are regulated by tropomyosin isoforms.

Authors:  Galina Schevzov; Nicole S Bryce; Rowena Almonte-Baldonado; Josephine Joya; Jim J-C Lin; Edna Hardeman; Ron Weinberger; Peter Gunning
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Regulation of actin isoforms in cellular and developmental processes.

Authors:  Anna S Kashina
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 5.  The makings of the 'actin code': regulation of actin's biological function at the amino acid and nucleotide level.

Authors:  Pavan Vedula; Anna Kashina
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity.

Authors:  B Hinz; G Celetta; J J Tomasek; G Gabbiani; C Chaponnier
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Expression and function of the Drosophila ACT88F actin isoform is not restricted to the indirect flight muscles.

Authors:  U Nongthomba; S Pasalodos-Sanchez; S Clark; J D Clayton; J C Sparrow
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Maize profilin isoforms are functionally distinct.

Authors:  D R Kovar; B K Drøbak; C J Staiger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Differential epitope tagging of actin in transformed Drosophila produces distinct effects on myofibril assembly and function of the indirect flight muscle.

Authors:  V Brault; U Sauder; M C Reedy; U Aebi; C A Schoenenberger
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  A proteomic view into infection of greyback canegrubs (Dermolepida albohirtum) by Metarhizium anisopliae.

Authors:  Nirupama Shoby Manalil; Valentino S Junior Te'o; Kathy Braithwaite; Stevens Brumbley; Peter Samson; K M Helena Nevalainen
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.