Literature DB >> 9133465

Bone formation in vivo: comparison of osteogenesis by transplanted mouse and human marrow stromal fibroblasts.

P H Krebsbach1, S A Kuznetsov, K Satomura, R V Emmons, D W Rowe, P G Robey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marrow stromal fibroblasts (MSFs) are known to contain bone precursor cells. However, the osteogenic potential of human MSFs has been poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to compare the osteogenic capacity of mouse and human MSFs after implantation in vivo.
METHODS: After in vitro expansion, MSFs were loaded into a number of different vehicles and transplanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice.
RESULTS: Mouse MSFs transplanted within gelatin, polyvinyl sponges, and collagen matrices all formed a capsule of cortical-like bone surrounding a cavity with active hematopoiesis. In transplants of MSFs from transgenic mice harboring type I procollagen-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity was maintained for up to 14 weeks, indicating prolonged bone formation by transplanted MSFs. New bone formation by human MSFs was more dependent on both the in vitro expansion conditions and transplantation vehicles. Within gelatin, woven bone was observed sporadically and only after culture in the presence of dexamethasone and L-ascorbic acid phosphate magnesium salt n-hydrate. Consistent bone formation by human MSFs was achieved only within vehicles containing hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate ceramics (HA/TCP) in the form of blocks, powder, and HA/TCP powder-type I bovine fibrillar collagen strips, and bone was maintained for at least 19 weeks. Cells of the new bone were positive for human osteonectin showing their donor origin. HA/TCP powder, the HA/TCP powder-type I bovine fibrillar collagen strips, and HA/TCP powder held together with fibrin were easier to load and supported more extensive osteogenesis than HA/TCP blocks and thus may be more applicable for therapeutic use.
CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we describe the differences in the requirements for mouse and human MSFs to form bone, and report the development of a methodology for the consistent in vivo generation of extensive bone from human MSFs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9133465     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199704270-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  113 in total

Review 1.  A strategy for identifying osteoporosis risk genes.

Authors:  David Rowe; Alexander Lichtler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth.

Authors:  Masako Miura; Stan Gronthos; Mingrui Zhao; Bai Lu; Larry W Fisher; Pamela Gehron Robey; Songtao Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mesenchymal stem cells. A potential source for skeletal repair.

Authors:  W E Fibbe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  In vivo bone formation by human bone marrow cells: effect of osteogenic culture supplements and cell densities.

Authors:  S C Mendes; I Van Den Brink; J D De Bruijn; C A Van Blitterswijk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  A cultured living bone equivalent enhances bone formation when compared to a cell seeding approach.

Authors:  S C Mendes; M Sleijster; A Van Den Muysenberg; J D De Bruijn; C A Van Blitterswijk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Adipose tissue stem cells meet preadipocyte commitment: going back to the future.

Authors:  William P Cawthorn; Erica L Scheller; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Angiogenic and osteogenic potential of bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Darnell Kaigler; Giorgio Pagni; Chan-Ho Park; Susan A Tarle; Ronnda L Bartel; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Gene Therapy for Bone Repair Using Human Cells: Superior Osteogenic Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-Transduced Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Adipose Tissue Compared to Bone Marrow.

Authors:  Sofia Bougioukli; Osamu Sugiyama; William Pannell; Brandon Ortega; Matthew H Tan; Amy H Tang; Robert Yoho; Daniel A Oakes; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 9.  Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mirjam Fröhlich; Warren L Grayson; Leo Q Wan; Darja Marolt; Matej Drobnic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Controlling stem cell-mediated bone regeneration through tailored mechanical properties of collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Hongli Sun; Feng Zhu; Qingang Hu; Paul H Krebsbach
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.