BACKGROUND: Because of the possible presence of small holes, the effectiveness of condoms as barriers to virus transmission is controversial. GOALS: To determine the proportion of condoms that allow virus penetration and the amounts of virus that penetrate. STUDY DESIGN: A sensitive, static test was used to evaluate different condom types as barriers to a small virus, including brand with or without lubrication and ones of different materials. The test included some physiologic-based parameters and some parameters that exaggerated expected actual use conditions. RESULTS: Under test conditions, 2.6% (12 of 470) of the latex condoms allowed some virus penetration; the median level of penetration was 7 x 10(-4) ml. Lubricated condoms performed similarly to nonlubricated ones. Polyurethane condoms yielded results higher than but not statistically different from those for latex condoms. CONCLUSIONS: Few condoms allowed any virus penetration. The median amount of penetration for latex condoms when extrapolated to expected actual use conditions was 1 x 10(-5) ml (volume of semen). Thus, even for the few condoms that do allow virus penetration, the typical level of exposure to semen would be several orders of magnitude lower than for no condom at all.
BACKGROUND: Because of the possible presence of small holes, the effectiveness of condoms as barriers to virus transmission is controversial. GOALS: To determine the proportion of condoms that allow virus penetration and the amounts of virus that penetrate. STUDY DESIGN: A sensitive, static test was used to evaluate different condom types as barriers to a small virus, including brand with or without lubrication and ones of different materials. The test included some physiologic-based parameters and some parameters that exaggerated expected actual use conditions. RESULTS: Under test conditions, 2.6% (12 of 470) of the latex condoms allowed some virus penetration; the median level of penetration was 7 x 10(-4) ml. Lubricated condoms performed similarly to nonlubricated ones. Polyurethane condoms yielded results higher than but not statistically different from those for latex condoms. CONCLUSIONS: Few condoms allowed any virus penetration. The median amount of penetration for latex condoms when extrapolated to expected actual use conditions was 1 x 10(-5) ml (volume of semen). Thus, even for the few condoms that do allow virus penetration, the typical level of exposure to semen would be several orders of magnitude lower than for no condom at all.
Entities:
Keywords:
Americas; Barrier Methods; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Diseases; Family Planning; Government Agencies; Health; Measurement; North America; Northern America; Organizations; Public Health; Research Methodology; Research Report; Safety; Testing; United States; Usfda; Usphs; Viral Diseases--prevention and control
Authors: Richard A Crosby; Ralph J DiClemente; Gina M Wingood; Delia Lang; Kathy F Harrington Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Theresa M Exner; James M Tesoriero; Haven B Battles; Susie Hoffman; Joanne E Mantell; Jacqueline Correale; Jessica Adams-Skinner; Dara A Shapiro; Kirsten Rowe; Richard A Cotroneo; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Joyce Hunter; Susan J Klein Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-07
Authors: Françoise Barré-Sinoussi; Salim S Abdool Karim; Jan Albert; Linda-Gail Bekker; Chris Beyrer; Pedro Cahn; Alexandra Calmy; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Andrew Grulich; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Mona R Loutfy; Kamal M El Filali; Souleymane Mboup; Julio Sg Montaner; Paula Munderi; Vadim Pokrovsky; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Benjamin Young; Peter Godfrey-Faussett Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 5.396