Literature DB >> 9131824

Skin cancer and inorganic arsenic: uncertainty-status of risk.

K G Brown1, H R Guo, T L Kuo, H L Greene.   

Abstract

The current U.S. EPA standard for inorganic arsenic in drinking water is 50 ppb (microgram/L), dating to the National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation of 1976. The current EPA risk analysis predicts an increased lifetime skin cancer risk on the order of 3 or 4 per 1000 from chronic exposure at that concentration. Revision of the standard to only a few ppb, perhaps even less than 1 ppb, may be indicated by the EPA analysis to reduce the lifetime risk to an acceptable level. The cost to water utilities, and ultimately to their consumers, to conform to such a large reduction in the standard could easily reach several billion dollars, so it is particularly important to assess accurately the current risk and the risk reduction that would be achieved by a lower standard. This article addresses the major sources of uncertainty in the EPA analysis with respect to this objective. Specifically, it focuses on uncertainty and variability in the exposure estimates for the landmark study of Tseng and colleagues in Taiwan, analyzed using a reconstruction of the their exposure data. It is concluded that while the available dataset is suitable to establish the hazard of skin cancer, it is too highly summarized for reliable dose-response assessment. A new epidemiologic study is needed, designed for the requirements of dose-response assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9131824     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00841.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Chuanshu Huang; Qingdong Ke; Max Costa; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Nrf2 protects against As(III)-induced damage in mouse liver and bladder.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Zheping Huang; Jefferson Y Chan; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Cancer risk assessment for arsenic exposure through oyster consumption.

Authors:  How-Ran Guo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Inorganic arsenic: a need and an opportunity to improve risk assessment.

Authors:  W R Chappell; B D Beck; K G Brown; R Chaney; R Cothern; C R Cothern; K J Irgolic; D W North; I Thornton; T A Tsongas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Arsenic-related Bowen's disease, palmar keratosis, and skin cancer.

Authors:  M Cöl; C Cöl; A Soran; B S Sayli; S Oztürk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Arsenic-induced enhancement of ultraviolet radiation carcinogenesis in mouse skin: a dose-response study.

Authors:  Fredric J Burns; Ahmed N Uddin; Feng Wu; Arthur Nádas; Toby G Rossman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Cancer risks associated with arsenic in drinking water.

Authors:  How-Ran Guo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.