Literature DB >> 9130886

Cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments: a cohort study.

B J Van Voorhis1, A E Sparks, B D Allen, D W Stovall, C H Syrop, F K Chapler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center infertility practice. PATIENT(S): All patients treated for infertility in a 1-year time span. INTERVENTION(S): Intrauterine inseminations, clomiphene citrate and IUI (CC-IUI), hMG and IUI (hMG-IUI), assisted reproductive techniques (ART), and neosalpingostomy by laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All medical charges and pregnancy outcomes associated with the treatments were obtained. Cost-effectiveness ratios defined as cost per delivery were determined for each procedure. The effects of a woman's age and the number of spermatozoa inseminated on cost-effectiveness of the procedures was also determined. RESULT(S): Intrauterine inseminations, CC-IUI, and hMG-IUI have a similar cost per delivery of between $7,800 and $10,300. All of these were more cost-effective than ART, which had a cost per delivery of $37,000. Assisted reproductive techniques in women with blocked fallopian tubes was more cost-effective than tubal surgery performed by laparotomy, which had a cost per delivery of $76,000. Increasing age in women and lower numbers of spermatozoa inseminated were factors leading to higher costs per delivery for IUI, CC-IUI, hMG-IUI, and ART. Use of donor oocytes reduced the cost per delivery of older women to the range seen in younger women with ART. CONCLUSION(S): Our analysis supports, in general, the use of IUI, CC-IUI, and hMG-IUI before ART in women with open fallopian tubes. For women with blocked fallopian tubes, IVF-ET appears to be the best treatment from a cost-effectiveness standpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9130886     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81393-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  Infertility: from a personal to a public health problem.

Authors:  A T Fidler; J Bernstein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Economic evaluation of infertility treatment for tubal disease.

Authors:  M Granberg; A Strandell; J Thorburn; S Daya; M Wikland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Overnight maturation of a metaphase I oocyte retrieved from a natural cycle using human tubular fluid: a case report.

Authors:  Michelle Wan Xing Chng; Matthew Sie Kuei Lau; Melinda Chan; Heng Hao Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Fertility among testicular cancer survivors: a case-control study in the U.S.

Authors:  Christopher Kim; Katherine A McGlynn; Ruth McCorkle; Tongzhang Zheng; Ralph L Erickson; David W Niebuhr; Shuangge Ma; Yaqun Zhang; Yana Bai; Li Dai; Barry I Graubard; Briseis Kilfoy; Kathryn Hughes Barry; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Shvetha M Zarek; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Joseph E Osheroff; Eric D Levens
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-10-01

7.  The combined effect of age and basal follicle-stimulating hormone on the cost of a live birth at assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Melinda B Henne; Barbara J Stegmann; Adrienne B Neithardt; William H Catherino; Alicia Y Armstrong; Tzu-Cheg Kao; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Abdelkader; John Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009

Review 9.  Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Ian Cooke; Silke Dyer; Gamal Serour; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 15.610

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.