Literature DB >> 9130364

The tobacco industry's code of advertising in the United States: myth and reality.

J W Richards1, J B Tye, P M Fischer.   

Abstract

The major American tobacco companies developed and agreed to abide by the Cigarette Advertising Code in 1964. The stated aims of the code were to prohibit advertising directed at young people, to prohibit advertising that used fraudulent health claims, and to assure compliance with the code's provisions through the establishment of an administrative arm and enforcement mechanism to prescreen and monitor all cigarette advertising. In the 32 years since the Cigarette Advertising Code's adoption, the tobacco industry has used the existence of this code and its revisions and promises of self-regulation in accordance with this code as evidence that it promotes tobacco use only in a responsible manner. The code has served as the basis of the industry's efforts to avoid further local, state, and federal regulatory oversight of its marketing activities. A historical review of cigarette advertising since 1964 indicates that the voluntary code's major provisions have been regularly violated in the spirit and the letter. The administrative and enforcement provisions of the original Cigarette Advertising Code were quietly dismantled soon after the voluntary code's adoption and were completely omitted from the revised code in 1990. The historical evidence indicates that self-regulation of cigarette advertising and promotion by the tobacco industry has been repeatedly given trials and has not worked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9130364      PMCID: PMC1759528          DOI: 10.1136/tc.5.4.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  14 in total

Review 1.  Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies.

Authors:  P M Lantz; P D Jacobson; K E Warner; J Wasserman; H A Pollack; J Berson; A Ahlstrom
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina.

Authors:  E M Sebrié; J Barnoya; E J Pérez-Stable; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  How Philip Morris unlocked the Japanese cigarette market: lessons for global tobacco control.

Authors:  A Lambert; J D Sargent; S A Glantz; P M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  The role of tobacco advertising and promotion: themes employed in litigation by tobacco industry witnesses.

Authors:  Marvin E Goldberg; Ronald M Davis; Anne Marie O'Keefe
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report Curbing the Epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The tobacco industry's thwarting of marketing restrictions and health warnings in Lebanon.

Authors:  R Nakkash; K Lee
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 8.  "Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America.

Authors:  Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Project Cerberus: tobacco industry strategy to create an alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Attempts to undermine tobacco control: tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America.

Authors:  Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.