Literature DB >> 9128952

Role of dynamic MRI in the evaluation of head and neck cancers treated with radiation therapy.

Y Baba1, M Furusawa, R Murakami, T Yokoyama, Y Sakamoto, R Nishimura, Y Yamashita, M Takahashi, T Ishikawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the usefulness of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of head and neck cancers treated with radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-six patients (58 males and 18 females; ages 20-82) with head and neck cancers (10 nasopharyngeal carcinomas, 22 mesopharyngeal carcinomas, 10 hypopharyngeal carcinomas, 16 oral cavity carcinomas, 11 lingual carcinomas, and 7 laryngeal carcinomas) were treated by radiation therapy combined with concomitant low-dose cisplatinum. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before and 2 weeks after the irradiation in all cases. After bolus administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (0.1 mmol kg), images were obtained every 30 s (repetition time 200 ms, echo time 16 ms) using a 1.5 or 0.5-T superconductive unit. Biopsy or surgery was performed after radiation therapy and the histologic findings were correlated with the MRI findings (T1, T2, dynamic, and enhanced T1).
RESULTS: Complete remission, partial response, and no response were obtained in 18, 36, and 7 cases, respectively. Dynamic MRI correctly diagnosed 17 of the 18 complete remission cases, 33 of the 36 partial response cases, and all of the 7 no-response cases. The accuracy of dynamic MRI, T1-weighted image, T2-weighted image, and Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image was 94.4%, 68%, 82%, and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic MRI proved to be useful in the evaluation of the radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128952     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00595-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  A potential pitfall of MR imaging for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity.

Authors:  A Imaizumi; N Yoshino; I Yamada; K Nagumo; T Amagasa; K Omura; N Okada; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Early therapy evaluation of combined cetuximab and irinotecan in orthotopic pancreatic tumor xenografts by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hyunki Kim; Karri D Folks; Lingling Guo; Jeffery C Sellers; Naomi S Fineberg; Cecil R Stockard; William E Grizzle; Donald J Buchsbaum; Desiree E Morgan; James F George; Kurt R Zinn
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 4.  Postoperative Imaging and Surveillance in Large Nerve Perineural Spread.

Authors:  Jennifer Sommerville; Mitesh Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters as Biomarkers in Assessing Head and Neck Lesions After Chemoradiotherapy Using a Wide-Bore 3 Tesla Scanner.

Authors:  Gergely Lerant; Peter Sarkozy; Zoltan Takacsi-Nagy; Gabor Polony; Laszlo Tamas; Erika Toth; Andras Boer; Laszlo Javor; Maria Godeny
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Newer imaging techniques in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nilendu C Purandare; Venkatesh Rangarajan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

7.  A comparison of tumour perfusion assessed by deconvolution-based analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Sotirios Bisdas; Leon Medov; Mehran Baghi; George N Konstantinou; Jens Wagenblast; Choon Hua Thng; Thomas J Vogl; Tong San Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Nancy J Fischbein; Susan M Noworolski; Roland G Henry; Michael J Kaplan; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Treatment monitoring of paranasal sinus tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Davide Farina; Andrea Borghesi; Elisa Botturi; Marco Ravanelli; Roberto Maroldi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Multimodality imaging of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A D King
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.