Literature DB >> 9128272

The diagnostic value of the neutrophil left shift in predicting inflammatory and infectious disease.

J D Seebach1, R Morant, R Rüegg, B Seifert, J Fehr.   

Abstract

The use of neutrophil left-shift parameters in the diagnosis of inflammatory and infective disease (ID) was evaluated. The level of C-reactive protein (CRP), currently the best quantitative parameter of inflammation, was used as the gold standard. Of 292 patients, 230 (79%) had a level of CRP of 1.0 mg/dL or greater and were classified as having inflammation, whereas 62 (21%) had normal levels. The neutrophil band count in each patient was determined by microscopic examination of 200 WBCs. The diagnostic value of the band count as an indicator for ID was evaluated in comparison to the WBC count, the neutrophil count, and the left-shift indicators of two automated hematologic analyzers, H*1 Technicon (Bayer Technicon Instruments, Tarrytown, NY) and Coulter MAX M (Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, Fla). When receiver operating characteristics were used, the band count was superior to the immature to total neutrophil count (I/T) ratio, the total WBC count, and the neutrophil count. The sensitivity and specificity in identifying ID at designated cutoff points were as follows: band count of 20% or greater of total WBC count (53% and 79%, respectively), I/T ratio of 0.25 or greater (59% and 63%), total WBC count of 9.6 x 10(6)/mL or greater (68% and 56%), and neutrophil count of 8.0 x 10(6)/mL or greater (60% and 58%). The performance of the H*1 Technicon left-shift flag was similar but slightly inferior to the band count (sensitivity, 44%; specificity, 79%), whereas the Coulter MAX M flags had a clearly higher sensitivity (79%) and lower specificity (53%). In addition, microscopic evaluation to determine the presence of reactive morphologic changes in neutrophils, such as toxic granules, Döhle bodies, and cytoplasmic vacuoles, had a high sensitivity (80%) but a low specificity (58%) in predicting ID. The diagnostic value of both microscopic and automated neutrophil left-shift parameters as indicators for ID is limited. Morphologic changes in neutrophils, however, either have a high specificity (band count) or a high sensitivity (toxic signs) in predicting ID and therefore may be a clinically useful tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128272     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/107.5.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  28 in total

1.  Label-free hematology analysis using deep-ultraviolet microscopy.

Authors:  Ashkan Ojaghi; Gabriel Carrazana; Christina Caruso; Asad Abbas; David R Myers; Wilbur A Lam; Francisco E Robles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  New compact-type latex photometric immunoassay system for hemoglobin and three acute inflammation markers: neutrophil count, C-reactive protein, and anti-streptolysin O.

Authors:  Tatsuo Fukumori; Hironobu Ohta; Akio Okubo; Masayuki Hino; Kensuke Ohta; Takahisa Yamane; Noriyuki Tatsumi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Delta neutrophil index: A reliable marker to differentiate perforated appendicitis from non-perforated appendicitis in the elderly.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Shin; Young Suk Cho; Yoon Sung Kim; Hee Cheol Ahn; Young Taeck Oh; Sang O Park; Moo-Ho Won; Jun Hwi Cho; Young Myeong Kim; Jeong Yeol Seo; Young Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Delta mean neutrophil volume (ΔMNV) is comparable to procalcitonin for predicting postsurgical bacterial infection.

Authors:  Yihua Zhu; Xingjian Cao; Kexia Zhang; Wei Xie; Dongsheng Xu; Chongjun Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  [Initial patient assessment of infectious diseases and diagnostic steps with fever].

Authors:  A Schibli; M Weisser; R Bingisser; A F Widmer; M Battegay
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Lymphocytopenia and neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio predict bacteremia better than conventional infection markers in an emergency care unit.

Authors:  Cornelis P C de Jager; Paul T L van Wijk; Rejiv B Mathoera; Jacqueline de Jongh-Leuvenink; Tom van der Poll; Peter C Wever
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Delta neutrophil index as an early marker of disease severity in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Byung Hoon Park; Young Ae Kang; Moo Suk Park; Won Jai Jung; Su Hwan Lee; Sang Kook Lee; Song Yee Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Ji Ye Jung; Young Sam Kim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  A specific low-density neutrophil population correlates with hypercoagulation and disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Samantha M Morrissey; Anne E Geller; Xiaoling Hu; David Tieri; Chuanlin Ding; Christopher K Klaes; Elizabeth A Cooke; Matthew R Woeste; Zachary C Martin; Oscar Chen; Sarah E Bush; Huang-Ge Zhang; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Sean P Clifford; James Chen; Smita Ghare; Shirish S Barve; Lu Cai; Maiying Kong; Eric C Rouchka; Kenneth R McLeish; Silvia M Uriarte; Corey T Watson; Jiapeng Huang; Jun Yan
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Combined analysis of whole blood interferon gamma release assay and complete blood count analysis for rapid discrimination of active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Kang; Heechul Park; Sung-Bae Park; Junseong Kim; Jiyoung Lee; Jungho Kim; Sunyoung Park; Yong Sung Lee; Sunghyun Kim
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  Predictive value of lymphocytopenia and the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio for severe imported malaria.

Authors:  Marlies E van Wolfswinkel; Klaske Vliegenthart-Jongbloed; Mariana de Mendonça Melo; Peter C Wever; Matthew B McCall; Rob Koelewijn; Jaap J van Hellemond; Perry J van Genderen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.