Literature DB >> 9128265

CD31/PECAM automated and quantitative immunocytochemical assays in breast carcinomas: correlation with patient follow-up.

C Charpin1, S Garcia, C Bouvier, F Martini, L Andrac, P Bonnier, M N Lavaut, C Allasia.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of quantitative CD31 immunohistochemical assays. CD31 assays were performed on a series of 167 breast carcinoma specimens under optimal technical conditions that involved frozen sections, an automated immunoperoxidase technique, and computer-assisted analysis of digitized colored microscopic images. Results of automated quantitative immunohistochemical assays were correlated with patient follow-up (9.6 years). Patients were divided into two subgroups: those who had axillary lymph node-positive (N+) disease and those who had lymph node-negative (N-) disease. The marked immunocytochemical expression of CD31 in tumors (cutoff point, 20%) was significantly (P = .033) associated with a poor overall survival rate (Kaplan-Meier, log rank test); however, a significant association was not observed in the N+ and N- subgroups. CD31-immunostained tumor cell surfaces larger than 20% correlated with the metastasis-free survival rate (P = .004) in all patients and in the N+ subgroup (P = .005) but not in the N- subgroup. In addition, marked immunocytochemical expression of CD31 correlated with the short-term disease-free survival rate (P = .04) in the N+ subgroup but not in the N- subgroup. In multivariate analysis (proportional hazards regression, Cox model) the prognostic significance of CD31 was independent of tumor size and histologic type but not of grade. The results suggest that, under optimal technical conditions (automated and quantitative immunohistochemical assays on frozen sections), immunohistochemical expression of CD31 is a significant prognostic indicator of overall and metastasis-free survival rates. CD31 has limited prognostic value, however, and is not a completely independent prognostic indicator because it is related to nodal status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128265     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/107.5.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  10 in total

1.  Molecular markers (PECAM-1, ICAM-3, HLA-DR) determine prognosis in primary non-Hodgkin's gastric lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Alexander Darom; Ilias P Gomatos; Emmanuel Leandros; Emmu Chatzigianni; Dimitris Panousopoulos; Manousos M Konstadoulakis; George Androulakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Tumor angiogenesis change estimated by using diffuse optical spectroscopic tomography: demonstrated correlation in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Marius G Pakalniskis; Wendy A Wells; Mary C Schwab; Heather M Froehlich; Shudong Jiang; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Steven P Poplack; Peter A Kaufman; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The prognostic value of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Bo-hua Kuang; Xi-zhi Wen; Ya Ding; Rui-qing Peng; Pei-qiang Cai; Meng-qing Zhang; Feng Jiang; Xiao-shi Zhang; Xing Zhang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Review of the molecular profile and modern prognostic markers for gastric lymphoma: how do they affect clinical practice?

Authors:  Leonidas Alevizos; Ilias P Gomatos; Spyridon Smparounis; Manousos M Konstadoulakis; Georgios Zografos
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Vascular grading of angiogenesis: prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Hansen; D A Grabau; F B Sørensen; M Bak; W Vach; C Rose
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  c-Met overexpression in inflammatory breast carcinomas: automated quantification on tissue microarrays.

Authors:  S Garcia; J-P Dalès; J Jacquemier; E Charafe-Jauffret; D Birnbaum; L Andrac-Meyer; M-N Lavaut; C Allasia; S Carpentier-Meunier; P Bonnier; C Charpin-Taranger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Cell aggregation induces phosphorylation of PECAM-1 and Pyk2 and promotes tumor cell anchorage-independent growth.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Li-hua Xu; Qiang Yu
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 27.401

8.  Quantitative immunohistochemical expression of c Kit in breast carcinomas is predictive of patients' outcome.

Authors:  C Charpin; S Giusiano; S Charfi; V Secq; S Carpentier; L Andrac; M-N Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; S Garcia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Sticky and smelly issues: lessons on tumour cell and leucocyte trafficking, gene and immunotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  A B Alexandroff; C A McIntyre; J C Porter; J Zeuthen; R G Vile; D D Taub
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prediction of metastasis risk (11 year follow-up) using VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, Tie-2/Tek and CD105 expression in breast cancer (n=905).

Authors:  J P Dales; S Garcia; S Carpentier; L Andrac; O Ramuz; M N Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; C Taranger-Charpin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.