Literature DB >> 9127731

Peroxisome proliferation and beta-oxidation in Fao and MH1C1 rat hepatoma cells, HepG2 human hepatoblastoma cells and cultured human hepatocytes: effect of ciprofibrate.

S Duclos1, J Bride, L C Ramirez, P Bournot.   

Abstract

Human HepG2, rat Fao and MH1C1 hepatoma cell lines have been examined for their response to ciprofibrate, a potent peroxisome proliferator. Changes in the morphological characteristics of peroxisomes, the inductibility of their proliferation and of their beta-oxidation enzymes, palmitoyl-CoA oxidase and bifunctional enzyme, were studied in control and treated cells. In Fao cells, peroxisomes are less numerous and smaller than in rat liver, but they increase in size and number under the effect of ciprofibrate, similarly to those of treated rat liver. The high peroxisome proliferation is accompanied by a strong induction of beta-oxidation enzymes as in vivo. In MH1C1 cells, peroxisomes are seen in irregular clusters in the cytoplasm, small with rounded to tubular forms, suggesting rapid peroxisomal growth. A striking observation is the particularly elongated, worm-like form of many of the peroxisomes. Under the effect of ciprofibrate, the proliferation is low, as is the induction of beta-oxidation enzymes. HepG2 cells contain few, small peroxisomes with a heterogeneity of forms, from spherical to elongated. The only peroxisomal response to ciprofibrate in these cells seemed to be a morphological reorganization. There is little or no induction of beta-oxidation enzymes by ciprofibrate in HepG2 cells, as in cultured human hepatocytes. Therefore, on the one hand, Fao and MH1C1 cells are complementary tools in the investigation of the regulation of the hepatic response to peroxisome proliferators in the rat, on the other hand, HepG2 and Fao cells are useful in the study of the species specificity of the response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9127731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0171-9335            Impact factor:   4.492


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic-dependency of peroxisomal cell functions - emerging aspects.

Authors:  N Latruffe; J Vamecq; M Cherkaoui Malki
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

2.  Increased EHHADH Expression Predicting Poor Survival of Osteosarcoma by Integrating Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis and Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Juncheng Cui; Guoliang Yi; Jinxin Li; Yangtao Li; Dongyang Qian
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Phenylbutyrate up-regulates the adrenoleukodystrophy-related gene as a nonclassical peroxisome proliferator.

Authors:  Catherine Gondcaille; Marianne Depreter; Stéphane Fourcade; Maria Rita Lecca; Sabrina Leclercq; Pascal G P Martin; Thierry Pineau; Françoise Cadepond; Martine ElEtr; Nathalie Bertrand; Alain Beley; Sandrine Duclos; Dirk De Craemer; Frank Roels; Stéphane Savary; Maurice Bugaut
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 10.539

4.  A tuberous sclerosis complex signalling node at the peroxisome regulates mTORC1 and autophagy in response to ROS.

Authors:  Jiangwei Zhang; Jinhee Kim; Angela Alexander; Shengli Cai; Durga Nand Tripathi; Ruhee Dere; Andrew R Tee; Jacqueline Tait-Mulder; Alessia Di Nardo; Juliette M Han; Erica Kwiatkowski; Elaine A Dunlop; Kayleigh M Dodd; Rebecca D Folkerth; Phyllis L Faust; Michael B Kastan; Mustafa Sahin; Cheryl Lyn Walker
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  A Functional SMAD2/3 Binding Site in the PEX11β Promoter Identifies a Role for TGFβ in Peroxisome Proliferation in Humans.

Authors:  Afsoon S Azadi; Ruth E Carmichael; Werner J Kovacs; Janet Koster; Suzan Kors; Hans R Waterham; Michael Schrader
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.