Literature DB >> 9127157

Birth weight, prematurity and accuracy of gestational age.

M Mongelli1, J Gardosi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate commonly used birth weight categories in relation to gestational age assignment by menstrual (LMP) or ultrasound dates.
METHODS: A total of 34,249 cases were retrieved from the East Midlands Obstetric Database. Of these, 2281 (6.7%) delivered preterm (< 37 weeks) by ultrasound dating. The percentage of preterm and post-term cases was calculated for birth weight categories from < 1500 g to > 4499 g at 500 g intervals. The incidence of preterm delivery was estimated for birth weights from < 1500 g to 3400 g.
RESULTS: For the 'low birth weight' cut-off of 2500 g, only 64% were actually preterm as assessed by ultrasound, as opposed to 59% as judged by menstrual dates. Nearly 95% of infants weighing over 3000 g are full-term. For birth weights under 2900 g, there is a trend for LMP-derived gestational age to underestimate preterm delivery, by up to 35.5%. By ultrasound dating, 90% of infants under 1800 g are preterm, rising to 98.2% for those under 1500 g.
CONCLUSIONS: As nearly 40% of 'low birth weight' infants are born at term, the old classification of 'low birth weight' should be replaced by gestational age-specific percentile categories. Menstrual dates systematically underestimate the prevalence of preterm delivery. Previous estimates of preterm delivery rates based on LMP data have under-stated their true incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9127157     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(96)02835-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  3 in total

1.  Estimation of Day-Specific Probabilities of Conception during Natural Cycle in Women from Babylon.

Authors:  Hanan Al-Taee; Ban J Edan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-10-12

2.  Determining gestational age in a low-resource setting: validity of last menstrual period.

Authors:  Rebecca E Rosenberg; A S M Nawshad U Ahmed; Saifuddin Ahmed; Samir K Saha; M A K Azad Chowdhury; Robert E Black; Mathuram Santosham; Gary L Darmstadt
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Determining gestational age for public health care users in Brazil: comparison of methods and algorithm creation.

Authors:  Ana Paula Esteves Pereira; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Maria Helena Bastos; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama; Maria do Carmo Leal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.