Literature DB >> 9126236

Using prostate-specific antigen to eliminate the staging radionuclide bone scan.

C T Lee1, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

Traditionally the radionuclide bone scan has been the cornerstone of prostate cancer staging. Previous widespread use of bone-scan imaging was certainly reasonable, even in the asymptomatic patient, as clinicians had no methodology to predict who would or who would not have osseous metastases. Now, in the era of PSA testing, clinicians do have a timely, cost-effective method to determine those patients who are highly unlikely to have osseous metastases. As evidenced by several clinical studies noted previously, a radionuclide bone scan should not be obtained in staging the asymptomatic, newly diagnosed prostate cancer patient with a serum PSA level less than or equal to 10 ng/mL. Incorporation of clinical stage and tumor grade does not significantly improve the predictive value of PSA. Those patients with bone discomfort, however, should undergo bone imaging, regardless of the serum PSA level. Similarly, the serum PSA level may be used to avoid unnecessary bone-scan imaging in the patient with recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment. At this time, we do not have enough clinical information to determine the optimal PSA level that will predict precisely which patients will have osseous metastases. From the above reports, however, and the present authors' clinical experience, it would seem reasonable to avoid bone-scan imaging if the post-radical prostatectomy serum PSA level is not more than 2 ng/mL. No absolute data are available about recurrence after radiation therapy or for men being managed with watchful waiting. In an attempt to clarify this issue, there is currently a clinical study underway at the University of Michigan. This study assesses the minimum serum PSA elevation that necessitates bone imaging in restaging the asymptomatic patient with recurrent prostate cancer after radical surgery or definitive radiation therapy. The radionuclide bone scan continues to be the gold standard for the detection of osseous metastases in prostate cancer. Nevertheless, it is unnecessary in the specific situations outlined above. Serum PSA testing allows the physician to refine the use and application of this imaging study, thus providing an opportunity to eliminate expensive and time-consuming studies that ultimately do not contribute additional information. The national economic impact of doing so is tremendous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9126236     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70385-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  9 in total

Review 1.  Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Adam P Dicker; Edouard J Trabulsi; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  [Radionuclide bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clinical aspects and cost analysis].

Authors:  T Klatte; D Klatte; M Böhm; E P Allhoff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Pattern of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure dictates the probability of a positive bone scan in patients with an increasing PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Zohar A Dotan; Fernando J Bianco; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Paul Fearn; Howard I Scher; Kevin W Kelly; Hui-Ni Chen; Heiko Schöder; Hedvig Hricak; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen and other parameters in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Ataus; A Citçi; B Alici; A U Onder; K Sönmezoğlu; A Erözenci; V Solok
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Role of ¹¹C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in evaluating patients affected by prostate cancer with suspected relapse due to prostate-specific antigen elevation.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Muhannad Abuhilal; Giovanni Bosio; Claudio Simeone; Pierluigi Rossini; Claudio Pizzocaro; Emanuela Orlando; Marco Finamanti; Giorgio Biasiotto; Carlo Rodella; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Raffaele Giubbini
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Role of Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Abass Alavi
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-04-01

7.  The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer and Temporal Association to Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Ayman Mahdy; Rohan Patil; Shobha Parajuli
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-16

9.  Bone scan is of doubtful value as a first staging test in the primary presentation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lina M Carmona Echeverria; Lawrence Drudge-Coates; C Jason Wilkins; Gordon H Muir
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.